10 Jan
2012
10 Jan
'12
11:20 a.m.
+1
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 01:10, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi devs,
Since a long time ago, the xwiki/1.0 syntax has been deprecated in favor
of the new rendering engine and the 2.x syntaxes, but this has never been
declared deprecated formally. We should:
* mark the syntax as deprecated in the UI (like 2.1 was marked
experimental in the syntax choice dropdown)
* deprecate classes and methods that deal only with the old syntax
* push more for migrating all documents to the 2.1 syntax; the biggest
troublemaker is the statistics application
Here's my +1.
+1
We should also decide on a timeline for the complete removal of the 1.0
syntax. Is that something we want to do? Provided we manage to migrate
all
the official documents and some major contributed
applications during the
4.x cycle, is XWiki 5.0 a good target? We should package the support for
xwiki/1.0 as an optional extension installable using the extension
manager,
so that people can upgrade from older versions.
Or we could package just
a
syntax migrator that can be used for an automatic
conversion to a newer
syntax, without actually providing rendering support for it.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
______________________________**_________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs>