Hi Vincent,
I so agree with the fact that we should be able to override more than once.
so +0.5
Besides that, i am a little worried about a "number"-like system because
you as a user, never know which numbers are used and which not. But I
think it's hard to find a way to do it perfect.
Also, I would remark that components.txt becomes a description file and
that we invent a syntax for it when there are so many description syntaxes.
Thanks,
Anca
On 10/14/2011 09:53 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to improve the Component Override mechanism (currently based on
component-overrides.txt, see
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Component+Module#HOver…). We have
a limitation right now in that we can only have one level of override. The issue is that
we need more levels even right now since we have component impls in xwiki-commons or
xwiki-rendering that are overridden in xwiki-platform (thus using
component-overrides.txt). This means that users cannot provide their own implementations.
Thus I'd like to propose the following:
* Deprecate the component-overrides.txt file
* Add an optional priority level number that you can specify in the components.txt
* I propose the following format in components.txt:<priority level>:<full
package path to implementation as it is now>. Ex:
1000:org.xwiki.rendering.internal.macro.DefaultMacroManager
* Use a default priority of 1000 when not specified (same as for our Macro)
* Guarantee in the documentation that all components that the XWiki project provides
never have priorities under, say, 100. This is so that users who want to override know
that if they use a priority under 100 their impls will always win.
* Use a priority of 500 in platform when overriding components found in commons or
rendering.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs