Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] Do we still want to be accessible without javascript

Hi, FYI, there already exist an issue [1] in Jira for the problem you have mentioned, if I have properly understood. I`ve created the issue because I did not have the time, at that moment, to do it. Regarding the discussion, I`m -1 for explicitly writing code that checks the presence of JavaScript (or HTML moved to JavaScript just so that it gets added only when JS is activated, like your fix proposes). If we decide to stop supporting non-JS UIs then that is that. The UI elements will be there (links, menus, etc) but they will just not function properly. That's what everybody does and, if we do go that way, I believe it's a reasonable behavior. The web application (almost all by now) *requires* that you have JS on (which is on by default) and that if you feel like disabling it (because you probably know what you are doing) will most likely know how to re-enable it and to detect problems caused by your actions. I too feel like the effort we are putting into non-js UIs is considerable and I am not sure how appreciated or used it is by our users. Also, if enterprise is our concern, then I doubt enterprise users will start fiddling with the browser`s settings and start disabling JavaScript because they are feeling naughty :) Also, Firefox started hiding the option to disable JavaScript a while ago. It may be a bit of a developer's pride for us to see the product run without JS, but I`m not sure it`s ultimately very productive or gratifying even. +1 for dropping the backwards support, but only after we look into it a bit, see what solutions exist for problematic users and maybe provide some written guidelines on how to do it right. Thanks, Eduard ---------- [1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7970 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau < gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: