17 Oct
2014
17 Oct
'14
5:45 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Marius, thanks for the explanation, but I had no
confusion there. Maybe I
did not explain myself clear enough.
The question (originally asked by Vincent) from the OP is "Can/should we
use the livetable inside templates? Is the livetable part of
xwiki-platform-web or is a removable extension (xwiki-platform-livetable)?"
Yes, we should be able to use it.
Otherwise, as you said above, ". The rightsUI would need a change as well,
since it can no longer rely on the livetable" . So how would this happen
from a practical point of view? We'd have another sort of table in the
platform-web default ressources which can be used by the vms, which is nice
and fancy and shiny but it's _not_ the livetable? And then the livetable
would continue to be a nice and shiny table but a different one, installed
as an extension? What would be the point of that? Or we'd make the rights
UI ugly because we won't make another shiny table? It doesn't make sense.
We need a nice table to implement default features, let the livetable be it
(and have only one), even if it means changing the livetable from an
extension to a standard web feature.
Thanks,
Anca
Do we want to have that as a common practice inside templates when listing
documents or not?
If we do want it to be used inside templates, does it make sense to ask
each template to implement its own data source (like you are proposing now
for the delete space UI example) or should we allow the templates to use
the default data source (by making it a template as well)?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
files
by
works
the
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/master/xwiki-platform-core/xwi…
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Edy, you're mixing two things:
(1) The live table widget. This is currently provided by
xwiki-platform-web. The widget has some HTML template (currently in
macros.vm), some JavaScript code (livetable.js) and some CSS
(livetable.css). The widget is configurable. The main configuration
option is the data source. As written on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Livetable+Macro#HParam…
you can specify the data source either using the
'resultPage' or the
'url' parameter. What's important is that it can use **any** data
source.
(2) The default data source. This is currently provided by
xwiki-platform-livetable. Many applications have their own data
sources though. You don't need this to use the live table widget.
For the delete space UI issue you can use the "url" parameter server
the live table JSON from a template, so you don't need
xwiki-platform-livetable.
The only question for me is whether the default data source should be
moved to a template or not. I don't think we need to move it.
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> While looking into the delete space UI issue [1], we first thought
about
directly
using the livetable macro to list the documents to be deleted
from
the space.
Now the problem, as state by Vincent: Can/should we use the livetable
inside templates? Is the livetable part of xwiki-platform-web or is a
removable extension (xwiki-platform-livetable)?
Currently, xwiki-platform-livetable only contains the 2 pages that
generate
> the JSON for the livetable, but the html markup is generated by the
> #livetable macro (macros.vm) and the livetable.css and livetable.js are all
in xwiki-platform-web.
The only case of it being used in templates right now is in rightsUI.vm
[2]
> where the macro is not directly called, but the html markup is created hand and
the javascript and css is included.
IMO, we should decide on a single approach for the livetable and use it
all
the way. What we do currently can be confusing
even for us.
I currently see two directions:
1) Move the content of xwiki-platform-livetable in a xwiki-platform-web
as
> templates so that the livetable is a core feature and that it also in
livetable
the UI when the database is empty.
2) Move the livetable macro (as wiki macro?), js (as JSX) and css (as
SSX)
> from xwiki-platform-web to xwiki-platform-livetable and see the as just
another extension/feature that is only present when installed.
The
> rightsUI would need a change as well, since it can no longer rely on livetable
and probbaly we would also need to find a way to allow
extenions
to contribute filesystem resources.
I thought it would be a good idea to open a discussion on this topic
since
it's currently, AFAIK, a grey area.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Eduard
----------
[1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8320
[2]
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs