On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:19, daniel glazman
<daniel.glazman(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Le 16 juin 2017 à 10:17, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> a écrit :
I'm not talking specifically to you.
Ok. That wasn't clear since you were replying to my message.
This is just a summary of the
thread and everything got a -1 except "Standard".
Not sure it's the best choice from a Sales' point of view.
There’s no sales involved here...This is an open source project and it’s not sold ;) Maybe
you meant “marketing” (which has a meaning in open source projects).
Sure, that’s your opinion (you may even be right!) but not the one of the others who
replied.
We’ll still be able to change the name between 9.5RC1 and final, and even in the future if
we find it’s not good enough or if we find a better one that we like more.
You should also know that this project is a meritocracy and has a Governance defined and
the binding votes/decisions are done by the XWiki Committers (see