What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.”
?
:)
So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators during that
period.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>>
>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>
>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>
>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>> committers or leave them in.
>>
>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>> release development.
>>
>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>
>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>
>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>
>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>
--
Thomas Mortagne