your application and XWiki Repository as a
platform to distribute
has?
is?
extensions are very different technically and are
starting to be
pretty big Marius and me decided to separated them in two different
modules. The main link between them is that Extension Manager has a
handler for this kind of repositories exactly like it has one for
maven repositories (and more later). It makes easier to manage them
separately in UI tests, Jira,etc.
Sorry but I don't really understand what you mean.
Can you give me a use case where someone would use commons-repository
alone (without xwiki-extension)?
I don't understand why it's a problem to have
xwiki-commons-extension/xwiki-commons-extension-repository/ and what it
changes for ui tests, jira, etc
I also see we have
xwiki-commons-extension/xwiki-commons-extension-repositories/ what are
those compared to xwiki-commons-repository?
Also xwiki-commons-repository-api is pretty empty… It has a class which is
about REST and which should probably be in a REST module and there's
another one which is an interface with no methods.
I really don't see the point of a separate top module in commons. I'm
probably missing something.
Thanks
-Vincent
> Note1: Its description in pom.xml is pretty
vague:
> <description>XWiki Commons - Repository</description>
> In commons-repository-api it's even worse:
> <description>Contains commons stuff to use in a a client or a server
implementation</description>
not
described either, nor on e.x.o
I just finished the refactoring on git yesterday...
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org