2014-02-26 18:57 GMT+01:00 Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu>lu>:
  On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Caleb James
DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca
 wrote: 
  Overall I'm generally in favor of migrating
away from prototype but I 
 don't
  know what this vote is about.
 
 This vote is about deprecating prototype.js in favor of jQuery.
 It means developing any new feature using jQuery and put all the effort 
 we
  can in migrating existing features to jQuery
until the point we can vote
 the removal of prototype.js, and put it aside, as an possible extension.
 >
 > Will we still be including prototype in every page load? Will it still 
 be
  > bound to the $ variable? If so then loading
jquery for a small widget 
 is
  a
  performance issue.
 If the vote were to change prototype from holding the $ global variable 
 and
 > only load it on demand (requirejs) and refactor all of our code to deal
 > with
 > it, I'd be in favor of this even though it will break backward compat 
 for
  > the
 > user. If we're not willing to (ever) break backward compat then talking
 > about
 > jquery is silly, we're a prototype shop, that's just our fate.
 >
 > This vote looks like a sort of non-binding resolution in favor of 
 jquery
  > and
 > disfavor of prototype so for that I'll give a non-binding +1.
 >
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Caleb
 >
 >
 > On 02/26/2014 02:15 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
 > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org>
 > wrote:
 > >> +1 (both the vote and Marius' suggestions)
 > >>
 > >
 > >> But we also need to decide on an OOP framework for jQuery, if we 
still
  > >> want to write OOP widgets instead
of some raw function hell.
 > >
 > > +1, otherwise it will be harder to migrate the current object 
 oriented
  > > code written in Prototype.js .
 > >
 > > Thanks,
 > > Marius
 > >
 > >>
 > >> On 02/25/2014 05:34 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
 > >>> I would add that we should use it with require.js and that we 
should
  > >>> make sure the jQuery plugins we
pick integrate with require.js
 > >>>
 > >>> Thanks,
 > >>> Marius
 > >>>
 > >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
 > >>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
 > >>>> +1, most of the mainstream JavaScript frameworks (Angular, Ember,
 > >>>> Backbone) integrate very well with jQuery so we shouldn't have
any
 > >>>> problem picking one of these JavaScript frameworks later.
 > >>>>
 > >>>> Thanks,
 > >>>> Marius
 > >>>>
 > >>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
 > >>>> <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
 > >>>>> Hi devs,
 > >>>>>
 > >>>>> This has been brought into discussion several times so this
 thread
  is
  >>>>> intended for this particular
topic.
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Thanks,
 >>>>> Caty
 >>
 >> --
 >> Sergiu Dumitriu
 >> 
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> devs mailing list
 >> devs(a)xwiki.org
 >> 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 > _______________________________________________
 > devs mailing list
 > devs(a)xwiki.org
 > 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 >
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 
 --
 Denis Gervalle
 SOFTEC sa - CEO
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
  _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 
 --
 Denis Gervalle
 SOFTEC sa - CEO
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org