Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

On 9 Feb 2017, at 13:24, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote: +1 Hope it won't slow down the release process too much, especially since we release now more often. Should we do this only for final versions? Thanks, Caty On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote: > (This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation > object) > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne > <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote: >> There is a typo in the previous URL: >> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet? > lowerBound=20161201&upperBound=20170106 >> >> I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date >> like "201601201". >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne >> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote: >>> Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/ > BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106 >>> >>> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or >>>>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and >>>>> copy/pasting the result) >>>> >>>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate: >>>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of > the release development.” >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>>> :) >>>> >>>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of > translators during that period. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >>>>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Marius >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release > notes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who > participates in >>>>>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can think of 3 more items to add: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the >>>>>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to > report >>>>>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the > quality of >>>>>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to > also >>>>>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been >>>>>>> committers or leave them in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start > of the >>>>>>> release development. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ideally we would also ack: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release >>>>>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that > made it >>>>>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also > commits >>>>>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we > could do >>>>>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the > development (when >>>>>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to > add >>>>>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thomas Mortagne >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Mortagne >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne >