On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Since we're going to use Maven POM metadata to display extensions in the
Extension Manager UI it's important that we have all data filled and with correct
value.
>>>
>>> Sergiu pointed to me that currently our website <url> are wrong.
>>>
>>> This is because the top level POM has <url>http://xwiki.org</url>
and Maven automatically suffixes it with artifact Ids.
>>>
>>> For example for Commons Component API this gives us:
>>>
>>>
<url>http://xwiki.org/xwiki-commons-pom/xwiki-commons-core/xwiki-commons-component/xwiki-commons-component-api</url>
>>>
>>> which is not pointing to anything valid.
>>>
>>> I see 2 ways of fixing this:
>>>
>>> Solution 1
>>> ========
>>>
>>> Do as I started this morning, i.e. set the <url> explicitly. For
example I've set PHP Macro module URL this morning to
<url>http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/PHP+Macro</url> and
Commons Observation API (the 3 modules: parent + api + local) to
<url>http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Observation+Module</url>.
>>>
>>> Pros:
>>> - Easy and we can point to wherever the documentation is located
>>>
>>> Cons:
>>> - Tedious
>>> - Fragile. If we rename a page on the wiki then the link is broken
>>>
>>
>> -0. Not a big fan of this solution., way too much work.
>>
>>> Solution 2
>>> ========
>>>
>>> Set the top level URL to something like:
>>>
>>> <url>http://xwiki.org/documentation?id=</url>
>>>
>>> For example for Commons Component API this will generate:
>>>
>>>
<url>http://xwiki.org/documenation?id=/xwiki-commons-pom/xwiki-commons-core/xwiki-commons-component/xwiki-commons-component-api</url>
>>>
>>> Then:
>>> * Have an apache redirection for /documentation to some wiki page such as
http://xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ModuleDocumentation
>>> * Have the logic inside that page to transform paths (such as
"/xwiki-commons-pom/xwiki-commons-core/xwiki-commons-component/xwiki-commons-component-api"
into proper URLs). Since I don't think we can have a generic logic, I'd simply put
a big hashtable to start with.
>>>
>>> Pros:
>>> - Simple, no need to modify all poms. We only need to change the top level
pom <url> value
>>> - Much easier to keep up to date since when we rename pages all we need to do
is edit the ModuleDocumentation page. Actually when we support page renames across wikis
we could have the links in that page be automatically renamed ;) With Solution 1, when you
rename the URL you need to re-release the module which is a big pain.
>>>
>>> Cons:
>>> - I can't see any really :) We just need to be sure that
http://xwiki.org/documentation is available.
>>>
>>> So I'm definitely for 2, WDYT?
>>
>> Solution 3
>> ========
>>
>> Set the top level URL to something like:
>>
>>
<url>http://xwiki.org/documentation?id=${groupId}:${artifactId}</url>
>> (maybe
<url>http://xwiki.org/documentation?id=${groupId}:${artifactId}&path=</url>
>> if we can't disable auto-completion).
>
> We can't disable auto-completion AFAIK - I've google it earlier today with no
luck (if by that you mean the fact that maven suffixes the base url with the artifact
ids).
>
>> And use the id to find the extensions page on
extensions.xwiki.org
>> instead of maintaining a map.
>
> It's mostly the same thing since we can extract the last segment in the path +
we'll still need to maintain a map since we don't have web page for all
submodules. For ex for the 3 modules in commons observation it's the same
documentation URL.
Assuming the artifactid is always unique and no other contrib
extensions has a common part after ":" in its id.
This solution is about resolving the page instead of having to
maintain a static map, for the guy who will have to maintain this map
it's very different :)
BTW I still don't get your proposal. How do you find the extension page from the
extension id?
Or is your suggestion to rename all extension page to be named
.../Extension/${groupId}:${artifactId} ? (in which case it's a big change and I'm
not sure I like it because the URLs won't be nice, and there will be differences in
page names between extensions).
What did I miss?