29 May
2012
29 May
'12
7:15 p.m.
Ok it's clearer now thanks :)
2012/5/29 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
On May 29, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Thanks
-Vincent
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Jeremie BOUSQUET
<jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well, I have no problem to use "org.xwiki.contrib" for groupId (though
> I personnally don't like to put unrelated projects at same level in
> repositories),
Yes and thanks Sergiu for correcting me. I wasn't thinking straight when I first
replied to Jeremie.
> but I don't really understand the
motivation to use
> org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive for the java package ...
> Well I understand it, but as I started this as a component, I used the
> usual packages for components, ie "org.xwiki.component.mailarchive".
> Should I really refactor my code to use "contrib" instead of
> "component" ?
Yes.
org.xwiki.* is reserved for the XWiki Dev team except for org.xwiki.contrib.* which is
reserved for contrib projects.
Also your code is not related to the component module (org.xwiki.component is reserved
for the Component module) so it wouldn't make much sense to use org.xwiki.component.
> Do you mean that if a component makes it way
from
> contrib to xwiki core, you change the java package naming ?
Yes, that's the current strategy. With modern IDEs, renaming is quite fast.
Note that the target package (if moved in platform) would be org.xwiki.mailarchive (if we
agree about the "mailarchive" module name).
I'm a
bit
surprised but I'll do as you defined of course.
Hmm... Vincent, WDYT? > 2012/5/29 Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com>om>:
>> On 05/29/2012 04:07 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear community,
>>>
>>> I would like to request for a new contrib project to store the Mail
>>> Archive application I'm currently writing.
>>>
>>> Name: xwiki-application-mailarchive
>>> Description: A mailing-list archive application.
>>>
>>> - For now a GitHub project to store sources should be fine. My
>>> username on GitHub is "jbousque".
>>> - For Jira it might be useful to have a project once the application
>>> is released "officially", that is still not the case. Meanwhile
the
>>> generic project is ok for me.
>>> - There is a specific page in Design space on xwiki.org :
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication ,
>>> but for now no extension has been added. I would like if possible to
>>> test my extension (automatic install with dependencies) before
>>> publishing it
>>>
>>> The Design page also gives some info about the current state and
>>> progress, and some screenshots. There is many remaining work, but it
>>> begins to look like something usable. The bad side is the lack of unit
>>> tests most of all ...
>>>
>>> A question : the groupId "org.xwiki.contrib" is to be used, do I
have
>>> to use this exact groupId or can there be sublevels if needed ?
>>> If so I would use org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive as groupId.
>>
>>
>> The groupId should be org.xwiki.contrib, but "groupId" means the
groupId
>> part of the maven artifact identity.
>>
>> However, the java package name *should* be org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive
>> --
>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs