7 Oct
2015
7 Oct
'15
4:08 p.m.
This is from an old proposal
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/FlamingoAddMenuLocation…
just like we have the messages and notifications count states, we could
also display a watch state if the page is being watched.
But the activator to watch spaces, wikis and pages I think it should stay
in the content menu.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization
it
but
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi guys,
Sorry for jumping in late on this one, but has I have probably already
mentioned in the issue, I really find inappropriate not to have a quickly
look on whether you are watching the current page or not (no matter if
you
watch it directly or indirectly). So, IMO, the
watch icon should show up
outside of the menu, and resume you watch state. It is both a action and
a
state, and IMO it deserver a better place in the
UI.
Obviously, if you add that the proposal 1.3, it gonna make a lot of menu,
and I would say too much.
Am I alone concerned by the important of pushing
that watch feature in a
better place ?
I agree we should see the "watch" state without any additional clicks.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Results for now:
>
> 1.1: -0 (me), -1 (Jean), -1 (Yacine)
> 1.2: +1 (me), -0 (Jean), +1 (Caty), +1 (Yacine)
> 1.3: 0 (me), +1 (Jean), +0 (Yacine), +1 (Guillaume Lerouge).
>
> So 1.1 is out.
>
> We still have 1.2 = 2 (me and Caty are the only binding votes) and 1.3
=
1
> (Jean is only the binding vote).
>
> It's a bit short to take a decision. Please vote!
>
>
> 2015-10-05 16:18 GMT+02:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <
> mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
>
> > For the record, the users that don't have delete and admin right on
> > the current document (i.e. the users that are neither administrators
> > nor the creator of the current document), which is the most common
use
> case
I think, will have only the Copy entry in the Actions menu with
> 1.2. In other words, most of the users will see a menu with only one
> entry.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau
> <gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is
that
> we
> > > have a too much crowded "more actions" menu.
> > >
> > > Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue:
> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587
> > >
> > > Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus:
> > >
> > > >
> > > I'm in favor of the solution 1.2.
> > >
> > > So:
> > >
> > > * -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the
most
> >
(thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much
> > importance
> > * +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties
> saying
> > if an item is a base action or an advanced one.
> >
> > * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't
have
an
> > alternative to propose.
> > * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created (
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would
be
> > > opposed to this.
> > > * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, > implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some
CSS we have).
However, I
> remember a client using this feature for a
convoluted use-case:
include a
> light wiki page in an other website via an
iframe. Anyway, we could
still
> > keep the viewer but remove the link.
> > * +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, it
> disturbs me to let an access to the source code of any wiki page,
including
> not-well-done applications created by users.
>
> Thanks,
> Guillaume
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> Committer on the XWiki.org project
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs