1 Oct
2015
1 Oct
'15
7:48 p.m.
Hello,
on my side I would say:
1.1 : -1
1.2 : +1
1.3 : +0
A : -0
B : +1
C : +1
D : +1
2015-10-01 16:58 GMT+01:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
1.2: +1
A: +1
B: +1
C: +1 but we need to make sure the print.css is properly declared in the
<head> tag
D: +0
There was also an idea from Vincent, about hiding Viewers when extradoc
tabs is displayed. This is an interesting idea, the only problem is that I
would prefer the tabs to be less and less displayed, so this means we would
need the menu.
Regarding 1.3, I think there are too many entries in the menu.
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
*Yacine KEBIR*
Web Designer / Front End Developer
yacine.kebir(a)xwiki.com
*Mobile: *+213 550 749 033
*Web Site : *www.xwiki.com
Hi.
With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is that we
have a too much crowded "more actions" menu.
Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue:
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587
Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization
I'm in favor of the solution 1.2.
So:
* -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the most
(thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much
importance
* +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties
saying
if an item is a base action or an advanced one.
* 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't have an
alternative to propose.
* +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created (
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would be
opposed to this.
* +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, it
implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have). However, I
remember a client using this feature for a convoluted use-case: include a
light wiki page in an other website via an iframe. Anyway, we could still
keep the viewer but remove the link.
* +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, but
it
disturbs me to let an access to the source code
of any wiki page,
including
not-well-done applications created by users.
Thanks,
Guillaume
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs