Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:24, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
>
> Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
period of 1 year (rolling period).
>
> We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
>
> Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
>
> Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
active (given my status is a bit special)?
You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
"* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
* Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in
companies
and see what their needs are * Monitoring the
enterprise wiki landscape
for
new features we should have * Comparing XWiki
with other wiki engines out
there
Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this
stopped
being my role.
Links please. I don't recall any recent posting from you on the points you
listed above... :)
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to switch me to a "retired" /
"emeritus"
status or something similar then?