Re: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] xwiki-application-mailarchive

Hi, just to recall that to you ... :) (I know, seems a bit of a rush on 4.2 cycle and there is no urgency on my side, just want to avoid moving too deep in the mailing-list)

2012/9/2 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: Thanks, Jeremie >> >> Thanks, >> Jeremie >> >> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>> Wow, eventually, it worked ... Had to switch to using >>> maven-release-plugin last version (2.3.2) instead of the one from >>> xwiki. >>> >>> Now I'm ... back to the initial issue with the enforcer : >>> >>> [WARNING] Rule 0: >>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with >>> message: >>> Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar" >>> && new java.io.File("C:\PRIVATE\Dropbox\MAILARCHIVE\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javado >>> c.jar").exists()) >>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Grrrr ! >>> >>> >>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>>> I eventually was able to use push to git from maven with release >>>> plugin (had to reinstall git with more preservative options). >>>> >>>> But previous issue is still there: when checking-out my tag from local >>>> clone in target/checkout, pom.xml files are not there so there's >>>> nothing to build for maven ... >>>> >>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>>>> Progressing but still failing ... >>>>> >>>>> ... it's like a nightmare. >>>>> >>>>> I gave up pushing to github from maven, I think there's something >>>>> wrong with windows/mysysgit/cygwin somehow. >>>>> >>>>> Now trying to release tag "xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1": >>>>> - it's pushed on github >>>>> - if I download the related zip (in "tag" tab on github), it's complete >>>>> - if I "release:perform" from maven, target/checkout folder contains >>>>> everything except pom.xml files ... of course release fails >>>>> >>>>> How can my pom.xml files be deleted when running "git checkout >>>>> xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1", while I can see them in my local >>>>> history and on github ??? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2012/8/31 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>>>>> I tried both, but not tried exhaustively possible combinations >>>>>> (ssh/https, maven/git conf, and my network proxy that comes in the way >>>>>> ...) >>>>>> BTW I'm not sure about how credentials for github should be fed to >>>>>> maven depending on SSH/HTTPS url connection used. >>>>>> Authentication with keys works from git command-line to push to >>>>>> github, but I think I miss some configuration maven-side. >>>>>> Actually from maven "git push" time-outs, or freezes forever, >>>>>> depending on protocol used. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/8/31 Thomas Mortagne &lt;thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com&gt;om>: >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET >>>>>>> &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Community, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to release my contrib project to nexus staging but having >>>>>>>> difficulties. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Couldn't manage to "git push" correctly from maven to github (though >>>>>>>> "git push" command-line works), so I use "-DpushChanges=false" during >>>>>>>> release:prepare and release:perform, and do a "git push" manually >>>>>>>> after release:prepare. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You sure you <scm> is right ? I see you indicated the https in >>>>>>> <developerConnection>, you should probably use the ssh one instead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now getting that during release:perform (***** were added, it's a >>>>>>>> correct path behind) : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0.1:enforce >>>>>>>> (enforce-javadoc-exists) @ xwiki-contrib-mailarchive --- >>>>>>>> [WARNING] Rule 0: >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with >>>>>>>> message: >>>>>>>> Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar" >>>>>>>> && new java.io.File("C:\*****\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javadoc.jar").exists()) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course javadoc does not exist at this level, as I'm trying to >>>>>>>> release from root aggregator. What I don't understand is why the >>>>>>>> enforcer rule fails ? Aggregator is of type "pom" as expected. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My command-line was: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mvn release:perform -DpushChanges=false >>>>>>>> -DconnectionUrl=scm:git:https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/xwiki-application-mailarchive.git >>>>>>>> -Dtag=xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Jeremie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2012/8/17 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>>>>>>>> Hi Vincent, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I saw that, no problem I'll update the groupId before doing the release :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Br, >>>>>>>>> Jeremie >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2012/8/16 Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt;et>: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In case you haven't followed we've updated the contrib rule for the maven group id, see >>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It would be great if you could update your groupid before you do the first release :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vincent & Sergiu, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, is it ok if I put docs to >>>>>>>>>>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/Documentation >>>>>>>>>>> (and others in same space) ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> By now I've almost finished writing first versions of: >>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.Documentation (home page) >>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.UserGuide >>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.AdminGuide >>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.OperationsGuide >>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.TroubleShooting >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I should be able to release 0.1 soon ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Br, >>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/13 Thomas Mortagne &lt;thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com&gt;om>: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie and all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back from holidays too :) Cool to see progress on this! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok I've parsed this thread and here's my take: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA: I'll create a dedicated JIRA project since the project seems large enough to warrant it >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ok, Thomas is doing it ATM, should be ready real soon :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Done, http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XMAILARCH. You should have the >>>>>>>>>>>> rights to do pretty much anything in this project. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation: our rule is currently to have pages on extensions.xwiki.org and if the project becomes too large to create a dedicated wiki for it, as we've done for rendering.xwiki.org, commons.xwiki.org, enterprise, etc for example (see http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome). IMO it's ok ATM to have several pages on e.x.o for the MailArchive application and we can decide later on to move it to its own wiki (after we have a 1.0 released IMO). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nexus: I'll create an account for you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you already have a user, cool. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension page, at least a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some screenshots, and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included in the application >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available online, and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated space) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's the best solution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the space I currently use for the main pages of my app is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MailArchive", I would propose to use the same for the documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space and put pages under: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That way publishing the doc online to contrib wiki would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straightforward with selective import. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Sergiu Dumitriu &lt;sergiu(a)xwiki.com&gt;om>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 10:38 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 04:34 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humm ... Just thinking I might put that directly inside my app xar ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm a big fan of self-documenting applications. It has the great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of always offering documentation matching the version in use. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you might also want to offer the latest released version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation online. I think there are some extensions that have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation that spans several pages, but honestly I don't know if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is something we want/we agreed upon. I'll leave it to others to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bring more information on this subject. There is the contrib wiki also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which could be a candidate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen extensions with a lot of documentation on their extension page, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I've seen things documented in several places. Personally, I don't like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge extension pages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension page, at least a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some screenshots, and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included in the application >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available online, and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated space) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Jeremie BOUSQUET &lt;jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jerome, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another thing about this project: I'd like to prepare things, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly the user guide part, so it's available when I'll publish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the extension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For this particular use-case though, I'd like to extend the user/admin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guide part on more than one page, as it may be quite large. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where should I put these pages ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie