On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca>wrote;wrote:
  Overall I'm generally in favor of migrating away
from prototype but I don't
 know what this vote is about.
 
This vote is about deprecating prototype.js in favor of jQuery.
It means developing any new feature using jQuery and put all the effort we
can in migrating existing features to jQuery until the point we can vote
the removal of prototype.js, and put it aside, as an possible extension.
 Will we still be including prototype in every page load? Will it still be
 bound to the $ variable? If so then loading jquery for a small widget is a
 performance issue.
 If the vote were to change prototype from holding the $ global variable and
 only load it on demand (requirejs) and refactor all of our code to deal
 with
 it, I'd be in favor of this even though it will break backward compat for
 the
 user. If we're not willing to (ever) break backward compat then talking
 about
 jquery is silly, we're a prototype shop, that's just our fate.
 This vote looks like a sort of non-binding resolution in favor of jquery
 and
 disfavor of prototype so for that I'll give a non-binding +1.
 Thanks,
 Caleb
 On 02/26/2014 02:15 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
  On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.org> 
 wrote:
   +1 (both
the vote and Marius' suggestions)
 
  But we also need to decide on an OOP framework
for jQuery, if we still
 want to write OOP widgets instead of some raw function hell. 
 +1, otherwise it will be harder to migrate the current object oriented
 code written in Prototype.js .
 Thanks,
 Marius
 On 02/25/2014 05:34 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
  I would add that we should use it with require.js
and that we should
 make sure the jQuery plugins we pick integrate with require.js
 Thanks,
 Marius
 On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
 <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> +1, most of the mainstream JavaScript frameworks (Angular, Ember,
> Backbone) integrate very well with jQuery so we shouldn't have any
> problem picking one of these JavaScript frameworks later.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> This has been brought into discussion several times so this thread is
>> intended for this particular topic.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty 
 --
 Sergiu Dumitriu
 
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
_______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
   _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO