21 Dec
2011
21 Dec
'11
12:30 p.m.
Hi,
+1 for VarA. Great work !
Charles
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Guillaume Fenollar <
guillaume.fenollar(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
of course +1 for VarA :-)
2011/12/20 Raluca Stavro <rstavro(a)xwiki.com>
will
we
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
IE7
Hi,
Ludovic suggested we should refresh the Default Color Theme for XE 3.4
with
> something new. Since (and long before) we dropped support for IE6 and > (XE 3.2) I wanted to add some CSS3
enhancement to our default skin:
> shadows, gradients, round corners, etc. So this is a good time to make
a
> proposal that integrates some CSS3
(gradients on menus, panels, tabs,
> buttons, forms; text-shadows; box-shadows; border-radius;) and a new
> ColorTheme into Colibri skin:
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/34Proposal
>
> There are 3 directions that can be voted for this proposal:
>
> *Var A:* Integrate the proposed Skin improvements and the new
ColorTheme
> into platform
> Demo at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/WebHome
>
> *Var B: *Don't integrate anything in the 3.4 timeframe and wait for a
new
> complete skin in 4.x = Current skin +
default ColorTheme (no changes)
> Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WebHome
>
> *Var C:* Integrate just the new proposed ColorTheme that will replace
the
> current DefaultColorTheme
> Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Standards/WebHome
>
>
>
> *Important remarks when making a decision:*
>
> *Var B* and *Var C *does not involve any changes, problems or
advantages
> from the current Colibri skin.
>
> Advantages for *Var A*:
> - Tested on IE7, IE8, IE9, Opera 11, Chrome 16, Firefox 8, Safari 5 and
> works beautifully.
> - Uses CSS3 declarations that makes the skin more nice (gradients,
round
corners,
shades, etc.)
Problems for *Var A*:
- The existing ColorThemes (from the ColorThemes space and
extensions.xwiki.org) will become deprecated for XE 3.4 since the new
skin
> needs shades for the gradients (this means the existing ColorThemes
> variables will be either used in ways they were not intended or they > not have all the variables declared). See my
previous mail about
> "[Discussion]
> Problematic ColorTheme
> extensibility"<http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ex6fgou6fl6vjwfr>
> - The CSS will become even more invalid (right now we have a
> -moz-border-radius and a word-wrap non valid declarations), but the new
> code contains 154 declarations for the gradients (covering
> -moz-linear-gradient, -webkit-gradient, -webkit-linear-gradient,
> -o-linear-gradient, -ms-linear-gradient, linear-gradient and filter:
> progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient proprietary declarations).
The
> invalidity comes because the proprietary
declarations are not yet W3C
> standard (and will not ever be a standard). The proposed standard W3C
> declaration (linear-gradient) is not yet supported consistently and
> correctly by browsers, but when it will become standard we can remove
all
the other
proprietary declarations.
+1 for Var A.
It looks way better than what we have right now and given the fact that will be able to update the CSS once
linear-gradient will consistently be
supported by browsers, I think that we should do this step and provide a
brighter UI.
Raluca.
--
Guillaume Fenollar
XWiki SysAdmin
Tel : +33 (0)1.83.62.65.97
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Please cast your vote.
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs