12 Jan
2010
12 Jan
'10
11:34 a.m.
Le 12-janv.-10 à 11:13, Thomas Mortagne a écrit :
why not the following:
- if the content contains ]]> use the normal procedure
- if the content does not (99% of the cases) use a CDATA
XML-wise it's equivalent.
paul
> Should this Plugin remain standalone or added as
another goal to
> the XAR plugin ?
I licensing is appropriate (all LGPL right) I would vote for a xar
plugin extension.
What do the XAR plugin writers think?
The plugin can
be seen as a preparation step for XAR plugin where
the content is kept separate from XML file so that IDEs language
support can be used.
BTW I am just wondering why the default export (Admin -> Export) is
exporting the content XML encoded and not within a CDATA construct.
A CDATA construct would make the content or code easier to read but
it would prevent the user from using "]]>" within the content.
I think the first reason would be that the code is using a XML writer
and let it handle escaping the way it want and did not tough a lot
about that. Also if CDATA make impossible to put any data (are you
sure ?) it would be a blocker for me anyway.