Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered
in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages.
Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then
the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and
(WYSIWYG) edit mode.
Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it
can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which
leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e.
the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an
example is
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 .
WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the editing safer?
FYI, I get a JavaScript exception ("XWiki is not defined") if I edit
Main.AllDocs when javascript.vm template is not imported in WYSIWYG
editing mode. Should the live table macro check if the XWiki JavaScript
object is present?
Thanks,
Marius
I'm +0.
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs