Re: [xwiki-dev] [M2] Differences of jars between Ant's build and m2's build

Vincent Massol a écrit : Needed for hibernate I think Needed for hibernate I think Hibernate. I don't think it's needed I think it comes from hibernate. I think it's needed Not needed I think this one is needed I think this one is needed I think this one is needed > concurrent I think this one is needed > derby 10.1.3.1 Not needed I think > ehcache 1.1 I think hibernate added this. I don't think it's needed > flipper what is that ? > hibernate-tools 2.1.3 Might be needed but I'm not sure > hsqldb 1.8.0 -> needed for hsqldb storage > exo services chart api 2.0 > exo services chart impl 2.0 > exo services commons api 2.0 > exo services database impl 2.0 > exo services organization impl 2.0 > exo services security impl 2.0 Needed for eXo portal mode > jimi No idea what this does > lucene 1.4.3 Don't remember which library added that one. I don't think it's used. > mysql connector java 3.1.7-bin Needed for mysql access > odmg 3.0 I think it comes from hibernate. Needed I think > qname 1.5.2 Not sure if it's needed > saaj 1.2 Not sure if it's needed > securityfilter 2.0 Needed for our authentication module > serializer 2.7.0 Not sure if it's needed > sl4j log4j12 1.0.1 Not sure if it's needed > swarmcache Hibernate. Not sure if it's needed > velocity tools 1.1 Needed > ws-common-java5 1.0.1 Not sure it's needed > wsdl4j 1.5.2 Note sure but maybe for the WS > xmlrpc-client 3.0 Needed > xsltc 2.7.0 > Needed for PDF > None of these jars are required for compiling the classes in > core/src/main/java. There are 2 possibilities: > 1) some are required at runtime > 2) some are extra jars that we don't need > > Could someone please tell me which jars fall in category 1) and which fall > in category 2)? > > Another question: Do we need the exo jars at all (this is the standard war, > not the exo one)? > > Version mismatch between Ant's and Maven2's builds > ================================================== > > antlr 2.7.2 (m2) vs 2.7.5 Not important I think > avalon fwk 4.1.3 vs 4.1.5 Not important I think > commons beanutils 1.6 vs 1.7 Not important I think > commons digester 1.6 vs 1.7 Not important I think >> > commons fileupload 1.0 vs 1.1.1 Not important I think > commons pool 1.2 vs 1.1 Might have a fix in the 1.2 that we need for multi-wiki support > ical4j 0.9.19 vs 0.9.19M Needed for the Calendar plugin. The modified versioned fixed a probleme with Google Calendar iCal > log4j 1.2.12 vs 1.2.13 Don't think it has any importance Same thing > xml apis 1.0.b2 vs 2.0.2 > xerces impl 2.5.0 vs xerces 2.7.1 > Same thing > These are jars that were added by transitive dependencies (as otherwise they > would have the same version). I need to know for which of them it's ok to > use the version brought by transitive deps (normally all I'd say but I'd > like to check). > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. > http://fr.mail.yahoo.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org > For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- Ludovic Dubost XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/ Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic