4 Sep
2009
4 Sep
'09
10:56 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Actually i was mainly thinking that we will rewrite all that in the
new model anyway so for me one way or another it's temporary code so i
think i would be more in favor of not changing the behavior of the
current getRenderedContent() and instead add new one for backward
compatibility.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:07, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
But would you be ok to make this change in 2.1M1?
Or would you prefer we live with it and instead document that it
doesn't execute in the document's contex (and instead add a new method
that does)? It's much simpler for sure but keeps adding to the mess.
We could decide to keep adding to the mess and fix it when we rewrite
that part in some far future. Hi,
Im trying to fix http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4274
Basically if you do
$xwiki.getDocument("someDoc").getRenderedContent()
it'll get executed in the context of the current doc which I believe
is wrong especially since other signatures of getRenderedContent()
execute in the target document's context.
I have fixed this locally but found that admin.vm for example is
assuming that getRenderedContent() will get executed in the context
of
the calling doc (i.e. XWiki.Import when doing an import for example).
FYI the chain flow is admin.vm -- getRenderedContent() -->
XWiki.AdminSheet --> XWiki.AdminImportSheet --> importinline.vm,
which
requires the current doc to be XWiki.Import (to get/put attachments
from/to it).
I can fix this easily using a new getRenderedContent signature I've
introduced.
However I'm wondering if we have other places that incorrectly use
getRenderedContent() and assume it won't be rendered in the context
of
the target document.
Is this change too dangerous to make? If not know, we'll need to it
quickly (2.1M1?) since it's an important bug IMO.
Yes it's a dangerous fix I think, getRenderedContent() is really not
an hidden method so changing its behavior that much even if it's a fix
is dangerous anyway.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne