4 Mar
2018
4 Mar
'18
12:46 p.m.
On 4 Mar 2018, at 12:36, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On a small data set, the advantage is still for XWQL, see
http://snippets.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Performance%20of%20SOLRQ…
Note that the majority of queries done by XWiki during a page rendering are done on small
result set.
But indeed, it would be interesting to load XWiki with, say 2M pages and do the test
again.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 4 Mar 2018, at 12:20, Ludovic Dubost
<ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi
This is interesting.
Now I believe these results might change under volume and also depending on
the type of queries. A like on xwql/hql would be slow while a solr text
search would give fast results.
Yes I agree. Obviously if we want to check this further we need to do more tests. Doing a
“LIKE” one is interesting. I’ll try to do one.
I’m lacking the data to do volume testing both in term of quantity of data and in term of
load on XWiki.
Another point to consider: this test is done with SOLR being embedded (which should
provide the best perf on low volumes IMO). On larger volumes you’d need to use an external
SOLR which would perform better but you’d suffer from the marshalling/unmarshalling of
requests/responses.
Thanks
-Vincent
Ludovic
Le 4 mars 2018 11:46, "Vincent Massol" <vincent(a)massol.net> a écrit :
Hi devs,
I was curious to know how SOLRQL compared vs XWQL (for example to progress
on the idea of moving more to using SOLRQL for doing queries and thus being
able for ex to use a store based on, say, git).
I put my quick result here: http://snippets.xwiki.org/
xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Performance%20of%20SOLRQL%20vs%20XWQL/
In short, it seems that XWQL wins by a factor of at least x2.
Is that your experience too?
Let me know if I’ve made a mistake somewhere.
Thanks
-Vincent