14 Oct
2010
14 Oct
'10
10:34 p.m.
Caleb,
it must a simple interpretation story.
That the spacemanager and invitationmanager plugins are retired is probably ok.
I just don't curriki to be flagged behind a "retired" path-name; I find it
ok that it depends on retired project.
paul
On 14 oct. 2010, at 22:22, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
On 10/14/2010 04:02 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
On 14 oct. 2010, at 19:10, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
But that would really mean the project curriki is retired or retiring.
I think this is not correct.
If you know what I really mean then you're a better man than me ;)
I just looked over my email history and I see there have been no changes to
InvitationManager in
over a year so continuing to build, test, and release it seems rather silly IMO.
I would stress that this will not prevent Curriki from building since the existing
versions will
remain in maven repository.
If in the future there is desire to begin maintaining the SpaceManager or
InvitationManager once
again, I don't see why they can't come back out of retirement.
Caleb
Your
proposal says "move Curriki to retired" ?
Oops, indeed it does. I meant
move only xwiki-plugin-invitationmanager and xwiki-plugin-spacemanager.
My proposal is that the historical maven builds will remain and the source will still be
avainable
in the contrib/retired section but no new builds will be created by hudson.
paul
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs