18 Aug
2008
18 Aug
'08
8:03 p.m.
On Aug 18, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
The new WYSIWYG is not bound to the XWiki 2.0 syntax. I have a
XHTMLConverter component with two implementations at this time: one (fully
working) using Vincent's new rendering module and one (needing some
adjustments) using the old Radeox engine. I could detect the page syntax
and lookup the right implementation, but is it worth doing? If not, how
should I react when the new WYSIWYG is forced on a page with the old
syntax?
Thanks,
Marius
+1
I think currently we can only use the new wysiwyg if we have a page
using XWiki 2.0 syntax right ?
yes.
-Vincent
Jerome Velociter wrote:
> +1. I've seen the new WYSIWYG in action and think it would be
> great/beneficial to have it experimental in 1.6M1.
> What about a parameter in xwiki.cfg to have it always available in
> the
> "editors" panel, like "New WYSIWYG [experimental]" ?
>
> Regards,
> Jerome.
>
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I propose to move the new WYSIWYG editor into the platform in
>> order to
>> have it as an experimental feature for 1.6M1.
>>
>> The following steps should be taken:
>> * Create a platform/web/wysiwyg module to host the code currently
>> resided
>> in sandbox/wysiwyg
>> * Change templates/edit.vm, templates/editpanels.vm and create
>> templates/editwysiwygnew.vm to make XE aware of the new editor.
>> This way
>> our users will be able to experiment the new WYSIWYG editor on any
>> page,
>> by having editor=wysiwygnew in the edit URL.
>> * Change platform/web/pom/xml and enterprise/web/pom.xml
>>
>> Here's my +1
>> Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs