About point 1):
Hi,
On 13 Jan 2015 at 10:51:23, vincent(a)massol.net
(vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
Hi,
According to
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance I wonder if we
shouldn’t update the following pages:
- Download Feedback page at
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DownloadCode/DownloadFeedback
- support page:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support#HProfessionalSupport
I can see 3 changes that could be required:
1) Maybe Espressto wants to add itself on those pages since Clemens is from that company.
Since it fulfills our Governance rules, Clemens is free to add Espressto there if he wants
to (if Espressto wants to).
Waiting for Clemen’s position on this.
Sorry for getting back that late.
Yes, thanks, I will add a few lines about my company in that section, as soon as I get an
ok for the English text I have (One of my bosses is a native English speaker and want to
proofread it).
Cheers
Clemens
2) Should we
remove Kreablo (Andreas) since he’s not been active for several years now and fails our
notion of Active Committer?
Removed. Let’s hope Andreas can become active again in the future!
3) I’ve counted 9 active XWiki SAS committer (see
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/HallOfFame). There are 13 active XWiki SAS
contributors in total though but 4 are not committers. So we should update the count I
think.
Updated.
Note: we’re not clear on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance if we require Active
Committership on the xwiki github org or on xwiki contrib. I feel that it should be on the
xwiki github org. Do you agree to explain this on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance ?
Updated.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs