26 May
2011
26 May
'11
10:51 a.m.
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 04:44 -0400, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
On 05/26/2011 04:25 AM, Luca Anca wrote:
I'm not necessarily against the release date, I just don't think that
this policy about tests is a good one. If we manage to have no tests
failing on the build by Monday, Monday is fine.
We can target Monday with an extension to, say, Thursday or next Monday
if we need time to fix regressions.
Unfortunately though, I'm not able to have a 1 on this proposal, be it a
+ or -, because I won't be able to spend time on the development of this
cycle.
Thanks,
Anca
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 23:03 -0400, Caleb James
DeLisle wrote:
When do you propose to release? I would like to propose releasing 3.1-RC1 on the
scheduled date. We (I) have lagged very badly with
the milestone release dates but now is the time to get this in order.
I would like to do the following:
1. Freeze on new features effective immediately. Everybody start working on stability.
2. Any test which is observed to pass and then fail must be @Ignored and a bug reported
for it.
I think these should be fixed, because they prove regressions (or are at
least a warning for a regression).
While I agree with timeboxing, I think this is slightly too much, as in
we shouldn't push a release with regressions just because we were late
with the milestones.
Caleb
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3. Release happens on Monday regardless of the
state of the tests.
see above.
Thanks,
Anca
Since the release date is upon us, I need a quick response on this.
WDYT?
Caleb
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs