Thanks Caty. In your proposal I don’t see where you put the TOC for non-page events.
Still haven't found a solution for the
avatar's group image, but the thing
is that when the user selects to receive the diffs in the mail, this user
grouping is confusing.
Indeed, we cannot group diffs I think. The diff needs to be under each change, not under
the whole grouped change.
For some events we display just the last change, not
all the changes, or we
display the whole diff, so it's kind of hard to tell which user did what.
A solution would be to display the entries separate, each with its own
diff. Not sure what is the best approach.
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 15:15, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 12:27, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Caty,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> There’ s something I don’t understand. Sometimes you have 2 icons
and
>>>>> sometimes only 1.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is only 1 icon if the action is done by the "Pages" app,
coming
>>> from
>>>> XWiki.
>>>> I've considered that this is the main/default app, so we don't
display
>>> it.
>>>> It's the default.
>>>> So if you have created, edited, delete, commented on a normal page, you
>>> get
>>>> just the event action.
>>>> If the page is special, coming from a particular application, then you
>>> have
>>>> an additional icon, marking the application.
>>>
>>> I find this highly confusing for my part :)
>>>
>>>> For me we always need 2 icons:
>>>>> * one to represent the application (e.g. Pages app, Blog app, etc)
>>>>> * one to represent the event (e.g. for the Paged app: Create,
Modify,
>>>>> Delete, Comment. For the Blog app: Publish a blog post)
>>>>>
>>>>> So if we display the avatar this means 3 icons: one for the avatar,
> one
>>>>> for the app and one for the event. Maybe that’s a bit too much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now, on the proposals I see, I find it very confusing and I
can
>>>>> never figure out which is the app and which is the event.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I would prefer the following:
>>>>> * On the left, avatar in big + app in smaller on top of it
>>>>> * On the right, icon for the event. Actually the icon could be in
>>> addition
>>>>> to the “text” (i.e. “edited by”, “published by”, “commented by”,
>>> “deleted
>>>>> by”, etc) or we could drop the icon for the event and only keep the
>>> text.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't drop the event icon since that's the most important
piece of
>>>> information now.
>>>
>>> I would not drop it but it’s already contained in the text on the right
> so
>>> that’s duplication.
>>>
>>> I’d use the avatar + the app and leave the event icon on the right or
>>> simply drop it in favor of the text (either one).
>>>
>>>> The grouping is done by page and by event.
>>>> You want to know if someone deleted a new entry or just edited in a
> rapid
>>>> way, without the need to read the text.
>>>
>>> I’d prefer to see who did something and what they modified. That’s
> really
>>> how I use XWiki’s AS the most personally.
>>>
>>> If the text is not visual enough the event icon is ok too but I wouldn’t
>>> put it on the left.
>>>
>>> In any case, you need consistency and all entries need to look the same.
>>> We must not have special cases as it makes it very hard to understand.
>>>
>>
>> For me it was confusing seeing "Pages", since in XWiki everything is a
> page
>> and I don't have any application called Pages. I saw the addition of
>> "Pages" as redundant.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> In your variations I don’t see one where the app icon is on the
left.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have put all the icons on the left in order to be easier to scan for
>>> them
>>>> in collapsed and expanded form. Having the icons on the right made the
>>>> layout very centered-heavy + you didn't had the extremities in order
to
>>>> scan for them.
>>>>
>>>> So Guillaume and Clement like the event-focused view.
>>>>
>>>> I don't particularly like the big event icons. I find them more cold
> and
>>>> less personal. So I prefer the users-centered version.
>>>
>>> Same here for the same reason, but… (see below)
>>>
>>>> I like:
>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
>>> NotificationsImprovements9xTypes/userCentered_smallAvatars_reverse.png
>>>
>>> I don’t like the generic group image, it breaks the nice UI with
> avatars.
>>> We could maybe resize the avatars and display up to 4 and if beyond then
>>> display some continuations symbol.
>>>
>>
>> Not really sure how to display 4 avatars + in a nice way, while still
> being
>> the main focus.
>
> There’s another problem too actually. Not all events are related to
> people. For example the “A new version of XWiki is available” event would
> not have an avatar. However we could decide to use an “X” icon,
> representing the
xwiki.org entity/avatar.
>
> What I wouldn’t like is some generic image such as a bland group image. I
> find that this breaks the concept of showing avatars.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>
>>>> Now I haven't created versions for all the combinations, but we
should
>>>> decide if:
>>>> - we want user focused vs. event focused layout
>>>> - expanded version should have users or events on the left;
>>>> - the summary should contain avatars or not for the users (important
> when
>>>> there is a single user that did the event);
>>>> - if / when we combine the users (when we have more than 2/3 users;
>>> always;
>>>>
>>>> I am lacking some information in order to get some statistical
> decisions.
>>>> For example, in practice:
>>>> - we have more individual events or more events done by multiple
> people?
>>>> - how common is to group also events? the example with blog published
>>> that
>>>> also has the create. Do we really need to display them? Also when
>>> creating
>>>> an user profile we launch a multitude of edit events, should all those
> be
>>>> displayed?
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the user vs. event focused layout: it's just in the layout
> and
>>>> what we display on the first position, since I've kept the current
>>>> page/event grouping that is currently implemented. The decision depends
>>> on
>>>> how everyone is using the wiki: are they more interested in activity
>>> being
>>>> done on the wiki or who actually did that activity?
>>>
>>> Both are needed and it depends on the usage I guess. My feeling is that
>>> humans are good at relationships in a group and a picture speaks more
> than
>>> a generic icon for an app. You know who you work with, you know people
> you
>>> like, you know who you consider is a stranger, etc and you’ll want to
> check
>>> the diff and dive further based on that. The fact that the avatar is
> shown
>>> prominently will help that.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>> I like to see who did what, but if the Notifications implementation
> will
>>>> always group users and we will get the Group icon, than this might not
> be
>>>> very nice.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Caty
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Oct 2017, at 17:31, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So these are some more iterations for the notifications layout
>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>> NotificationsImprovements9xTypes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've played with User centered vs. Event centered and
variants for
>>>>>> displaying the avatars, user names and event names.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know what version you prefer. Also you can fork the
prototypes
>>> if
>>>>>> you want to make some small changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net
>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 11:24, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-24 11:12 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 10:58, Guillaume Delhumeau
<
>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any news on this? I'd like to implement this
quickly because 9.10
>>> is
>>>>>>>>> coming
>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This the current status:
>>>>>>>>> * Caty proposed some improved layout for displaying
notifications
>>>>>>>>> * I commented about the need to display event + type,
and about
> the
>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>> to have a link to see the diff. I also mentioned that
we need to
>>> work
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> the mail template display
>>>>>>>>> * Caty replied and updated her proposal to take into
account those
>>>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>>>> * I kind of like Caty’s proposal focused on the user.
We want to
>>> favor
>>>>>>>>> contributions and I think it helps. It also makes the
UI more
>>>>> appealing
>>>>>>>>> visually.
>>>>>>>>> * You mentioned that you’d prefer a proposal more
focused on the
>>> event
>>>>>>>>> rather than the user
>>>>>>>>> * Thomas agrees with you
>>>>>>>>> * Edy mentioned some extra points
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have also mentioned that the diff we propose is too
technical for
>>>>> many
>>>>>>>> users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes and we have 4 solutions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Solution 1: make it simpler to understand for everyone
>>>>>>> * Solution 2: have a wiki admin UI level option to select
whether to
>>>>>>> include diff or not in the default template + user-level
profile UI
>>>>> option
>>>>>>> (ie. per user)
>>>>>>> * Solution 3: have a singe button in the mail, that, when
clicked,
>>>>>>> displays the diff (which is hidden by default)
>>>>>>> * Solution 4: implement 2 mail templates (one for simple
users and
> one
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> advanced users) and let the users choose in their profile
which one
>>> they
>>>>>>> want to receive + have a wiki admin UI level option to decide
which
> is
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> default when not overridden by the user.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I guess we need to decide about whether we show
the avatar as
> in
>>>>>>> Caty’s
>>>>>>>>> proposal or not, right? Is that what you’re asking
about
> Guillaume?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On my side, I don’t see the issue in displaying the
user avatar
>>> large
>>>>> vs
>>>>>>>>> small. The events are still ordered by page events.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-23 13:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Delhumeau
<
>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Note that you have a mail template for the
notifications too.
> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/
>>>>>>>>>>>
83b76ed4c26954aa2755bbdce23b32c41725ac06/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>>>>>>
core/xwiki-platform-notifications/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>>>>>>
notifications-ui/src/main/resources/XWiki/Notifications/
>>>>>>>>>>> MailTemplate.xml#L23 but it's not
documented yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This mail template allows you to customize
the header and the
>>> footer
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> the email, but not the actual content.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To be precise, each *event type* can have its
own template or
>>>>> failback
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> the default one
(
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/
>>>>>>>>>>>
acdf68f4c0d20a9b44ea48eec4df808e22c54548/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>>>>>>
core/xwiki-platform-web/src/main/webapp/templates/
>>>>>>>>>>> notification/email/default.html.vm)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So it's a template *per event type* and
it's not linked to any
>>> user
>>>>>>>>>>> choice. But we could add some options in the
default template
> for
>>>>>>>>> example.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-17 16:23 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2017, at 07:16, Guillaume
Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some ideas.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have feedback about the fact the
diff is way too technical
> for
>>>>>>>>> users.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example: "What does it
means???"
>
https://img15.hostingpics.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pics/670307example1.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we could hide this in a
"technical details" link.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s one option but there’s another
which is to provide the
>>>>> ability
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> choose which mail template to use in the
Admin and provide
>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>>> templates for different needs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For example for the
xwiki.org watchlist
we absolutely need to
> be
>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> see the diffs without clicking a
“technical details” link for
>>> each
>>>>>>>>>>>> notification. It could be ok if there’s a
single “technical
>>>>> details”
>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>>>> for ALL notifications that shows all
diffs at once.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "details" link could be
replaced by a "more" link, with a
>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplified diff (the complete diff
would go the the technical
>>>>>>> details
>>>>>>>>>>>> view).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the body of the event, in addition
with the title of the
>>>>>>> document,
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could add some extracts of the diff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example taken on gmail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/763456example2.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope it helps,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 15:38 GMT+02:00 Vincent
Massol <vincent(a)massol.net
>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks nice. Does it work in all
mail clients that support
> HTML?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like an option to show
the details for all events as
>>>>> otherwise
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too painful to have to open all
one by one (for the use case
>>> when
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to check everything).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same as Guillaume: not all events
are page-related events. So
>>> we
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> handle those too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 15:03,
Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First of all, it looks very
nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, you said the events are
displayed like in the
>>>>> notifications,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the notifications they are
ordered by dates, not by pages.
>>> Does
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal imply to change the
ordering? What about events
> that
>>> do
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern any page (like:
"a new wiki has been created" or "a
>>> new
>>>>>>>>> XWiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is available")?
We don't have such events for now
> but
>>> we
>>>>>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some soon. We could
display them last for example.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice CSS expand!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 14:47 GMT+02:00
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposal for
the Notifications mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NotificationsImprovements9xEmail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've continued with
the 'user' avatar focused proposal,
> since
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently focused on the
email template. If we drop the
> user
>>>>>>> avatar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we group multiple users)
then we can have the event/app
> icon
>>>>>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avatar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I want to have
feedback on is the email layout,
>>>>>>> functionality
>>>>>>>>>>>> (tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> navigation, details
expanding) and styling.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can play with the
Prototype
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://jsfiddle.net/risherry/cj25759w/embedded/#Result
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we were to translate
to the mail template, there are
> still
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be tested (like
translating the CSS selectors into
> inline,
>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email clients we support,
etc.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at
5:51 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 17:32
GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3,
2017 at 10:50 AM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-02
18:09 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <
>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2
Oct 2017, at 18:08, Vincent Massol <
>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:05, Vincent Massol <
>>>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Another feedback/questions:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
Is the avatar icon clickable and leading to the
> user
>>>>>>>>> profile?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
We need a way to link directly to the diff, at
> least
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that
the user can see what was modified (as we have
>>>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
Maybe “2 hours ago” is not precise enough. In your
>>>>>>> example I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created
and modified the Roadmap page but they both say
>>> “2
>>>>>>>>> hours
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn’t
I be able to see how far away both events
> were
>>>>>>> done?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My
understanding is that events are grouped by app+type
>>> but
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore
(for page events) and thus you can have 3
> events
>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
page, f.ex: Creation, Modification, Deletion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you could
also have different users grouped in the
>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>> composite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. So
when you display the details, it would be nice
>>> to
>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made each
event, and I see you have removed this info.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus of this
proposal is on user, compared to the
> old
>>>>> one,
>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the app/doc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Close to what we
have on Facebool. So it didn't made
> sense
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a page has been
edited by vmassol, and that the details
>>>>>>> showcase
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple user
actually did the edit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Facebook, you have
it actually:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://pasteboard.co/GOioRAT.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On XWiki, we have the
following (already implemented):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://pasteboard.co/GOiqgYf.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:01, Vincent Massol <
>>>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:54, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
valicac(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Event Type: BlogPostPublishedEvent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NotificationsImprovements9x#HEventTypes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ok thanks, had missed this since I was reading from
>>> top
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopped
at the overview :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
However I don’t think it scales since it means one
>>>>> unique
>>>>>>>>> icon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
combination of app type + event type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What would scale better is two icons: one for the
> app
>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the event
type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For example imagine that the Blog app had the
>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>> events:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
* When a blog post is published
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
* When a blog post is created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
* When a blog post is removed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You wouldn’t be able to use the RSS icon to
> represent
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BTW the RSS icon isn’t necessarily representative of
>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of
apps can have a RSS feed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That’s the main remark I have: it’s going to be
> harder
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find
unique icons as we had more events to apps,
>>> especially
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 icon
that is supposed to combine both app type +
> event
>>>>>>> type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Vincent Massol <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Caty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:21, Ecaterina Moraru
> (Valica)
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
valicac(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I've created some improvements suggestions for
> our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notifications
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UI, see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NotificationsImprovements9x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re the overview, I don’t see where you mention the
>>>>> app?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For example, could you show how a new Blog post
>>> would
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
differentiate that for example from a Page
> creation
>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
modification?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume
Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research
& Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on
the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research &
Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development
Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org
project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer
at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki
SAS
>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>
>