On Jan 21, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
This is not generic - this depends on the
containers. We have plenty of
working rules with 100%.
ok then I guess it means they should be commented. How will we remember the reason
otherwise? (open question)
Thanks
-Vincent
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 17:54, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/21/2010 04:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>> First commit! Yeah :) Champagne!
>>>>
>>>> Some questions below (hey I couldn't left the first commit go
without
>> questions ;))
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:24 PM, evalica (SVN) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Author: evalica
>>>>> Date: 2010-01-21 16:24:22 +0100 (Thu, 21 Jan 2010)
>>>>> New Revision: 26284
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>
platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> XSCOLIBRI-180: Scroll and width problems on Stats space
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>> platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> ---
platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>> 2010-01-21 14:52:45 UTC (rev 26283)
>>>>> +++
platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>> 2010-01-21 15:24:22 UTC (rev 26284)
>>>>> @@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> div.panellayoutcontainer-2col .panellayoutcol {
>>>>> - width: 50%;
>>>>> + width: 49%;
>>>>
>>>> Where does this magic number come from? Is the 1% important? If so maybe
>> this warrants some comment?
>>>
>>> There are rounding errors in IE, sometimes 50% + 50% = 101%
>>
>> ok thanks. My question was more: shouldn't we comment it?
>>
>> Or is it more generic and in this case should it be decided as a general
>> rule and put on
dev.xwiki.org in the best practices section?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent