12 Aug
2010
12 Aug
'10
2 p.m.
+0 provided that there is an order in the codenames set and the
mapping function between the version numbers and the codenames is
monotonic wrt to this order.
Preferably, the order is not defined as the set is defined ;), but it's
a well known, a priori chosen relation, such as the lexicographical order.
Thanks,
Anca
On 08/11/2010 06:17 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Hello friends,
I would like to propose introducing the use of code names for each release cycle of XWiki
(2.x, 3.x, etc.), using a agreed-on scheme (a la Ubuntu [1]). The main reason behind this
proposal is that :
A. it's groovy :)
B. there is no B.
As for the code name scheme, with regard to recent events involving a fair portion of the
XWiki Development team [2], I would like to propose the use of cocktail names as code
names. Some examples - for the sake of illustration : XWiki "Cuba Libre" 2.5,
XWiki "White Russian" 2.6, XWiki "Bloody Mary" 3.0, etc. you name it!
[3]. Virgin cocktails tolerated :)
The release manager for each cycle would have the honor to pick up the release code name.
Isn't that an awesome incentive ?
+1 for all that
Jerome.
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames
[2] http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWiki+Seminar'10
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cocktails
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs