RE: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] svn dirs reorganization

-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vincent@massol.net] Sent: samedi 21 octobre 2006 10:13 To: xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org Subject: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] svn dirs reorganization Hi, Following my post entitled "[Proposal] Plugins and xwiki distributions" I'd like to propose that we reorganize our SVN. Here's what I propose: xwiki/ |_ xwiki/ |_ trunks/ |_ branches/ |_ tags/ |_ xwiki-plugins/ |_ trunks/ |_ emailnotification/ |_ lucene/ |_ ... |_ branches/ |_ tags/ |_ xwiki-apps/ |_ trunks/ |_ branches/ |_ tags/ |_ xwiki-clients/ |_ trunks/ |_ branches/ |_ tags/ |_ xwiki-sandbox/ |_ trunks/ |_ branches/ |_ tags/ |_ xwiki-tools/ |_ trunks/ |_ branches/ |_ tags/ The rationale: * It's really cumbersome to have trunks/, tags/ and branches/ for each single module. It's easier and better to have only one per category (xwiki, xwiki-apps, xwiki-clients, etc). Of course each project inside these can still release in its own lifecycle and tag independently. For example check the plugins/tags/ dir for Maven (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/) and you'll see that each plugin is released separately. * Having trunks/ at different levels doesn't sound like a good idea. Actually I discovered this when trying to create svn:externals for all trunks. The same would happen if you tried to check out all the trunks manually. You would currently get some directories that are not under version control (xwiki-plugins/, xwiki-clients/, etc). The reason is that there's no way to check the contents of these directories by taking only the trunks and still having them under svn control. Thus my belief is that trunks/ dir at different directory levels in a SVN directory is not a good idea if everything is in the same project. Again a good structure is shown by Maven: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/ (all the trunks/ are at the same level) * Last, we have a gelc/gelcv1 dir. I don't think we should put version in the directory structure but rather use trunks and branches for this. I think it'd be better to use the trunk for v1 and when a v2 comes out, move the v1 to a branch and the v2 to the trunk. I'd like to reorganize the svn tree to follow what I've defined above. Let me know if you're ok for me to do it. As some of you might have some uncommitted changes in your local repo let me know if I can do it. I'd like to start with the xwiki-plugins/ tree. Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________________________________ ____ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com