8 Dec
2012
8 Dec
'12
7:09 p.m.
+1, sounds good
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
On 12/08/2012 09:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/7b45b48de1c6915294736dfddda74…
> I'd like to propose to start
using it and start writing our tests with
it since:
> After we've written/converted a
few tests (let's say in 1 month or so)
we can really decide if we like it and make it our official mocking tool or
if we should go back to JMock (but I have little doubts ;)).
> WDYT?
Looks good, +1.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi devs,
This week end I've been (at last) experimenting with Mockito (
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html)
and it's been successful so far :)
I've converted a first test to use it as a demonstrator of its power (
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-316):
* It's very easy to use. I was able to very
simply migrate an existing
test to it
* It makes our tests much more readable to read
and maintain IMO because
1) there's less boilerplate code, 2) it provides
default values for mocks
and 3) no more of ugly expectations syntax
* It's powerful, just see
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html
* It's actively maintained and developed, see
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/downloads/list and
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/source/list and
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/people/list