25 May
2011
25 May
'11
8:04 a.m.
On 05/20/2011 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
I'd rather upgrade to a more recent version of HSQLDB. The authors were
kind enough to solve a few bugs that were causing problems for us when
upgrading an older database.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/