18 Apr
2011
18 Apr
'11
5:33 p.m.
Hi Thomas,
On 04/08/2011 04:15 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
For simplicity I suggest we keep working on svn for
the 3.0 branch.
The project organization is very different between 3.1 and 3.0 and I
don't see us doing the same refactoring on 3.0 branch.
It means merging stuff by hand but it's not very hard.
WDYT ?
I don't see what's the problem with using git for 3.0 branch. I thought
git was better at branching and merging than svn. I tried a few merges
and they all worked fine and anyway it's easier to resolve a merge
conflict than to manually merge everything.
I'm -1 for using *only* svn for 3.0 branch. I'm fine with being able to
use both. Note that we already have the 3.0 and 2.7 branches on git and
I already did a few commits on both of them.
Thanks,
Marius