On Jun 29, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi ludovic,
All good points that I think all of us would like to see addressed as well.
Replies inline.
On Jun 29, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
While XWiki has many great advantages as a
framework which takes car of
persistence, forms, user management, content management and provides tons
of APIs, when traditional developers want to extend XWiki there are facing
a few difficulties:
- they are lost in the myriad of XWiki APIs, and there is no completion
Note that Edy and myself created an autcompletion extension last year but we didn't
get to publish it on e.x.o (it's here ATM:
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/wiki-editor-devtools).
I'm planning to continue and finish it this year during the coming hackathon in
July.
- they don't get good visibility of the code
available in their application
- it is complicated to use editors which have syntax highlighting
- they cannot use their favorite IDE
On the framework side there are also some improvements which could make
XWiki even more killer:
- easier integration of advanced JS framework
- advanced integration of a high level JS framework that has templating
(maybe angular js)
- better validation functions
- easier way to add REST APIs
- more XWiki and better documented javascript apis
Here are some proposals to help fix the tools issues. Three approaches can
be looked at:
1/ Live Sync between an XWiki Instance and and improved maven xar file
structure, allowing to use any local IDE on XWiki code
First it should be possible to use any IDE on the maven xar file structure,
allowing to open the content and textarea fields of all XML files.
For this XWiki XML files should externalize the content and textarea fields
in separate files with extensions based on their content type.
The maven xar format should be able to clean the maven structure to do this
splitting and should also be able to build the XAR from all the files.
Finally a program should allow to do a live sync between a local or remote
wiki instance and the maven project. Any change in either the wiki or the
file system should be replicated to the other party.
So if you run "git pull" then your local or remote wiki would be updated.
If a change is made in the wiki, the change would show up in the file
system and your IDE would refresh it.
The sync program would keep a state of the version in the wiki, in order to
be able to merge changes if changes occur in both places between two sync.
This tool could be easily launched with "mvn xar:sync"
Syntax highlighting for XWiki Syntax+Velocity+Groovy would be developped
for the most popular editors.
When syncing the tool could show syntax checking error messages.
2/ Integration with Eclipse
Based on XEclipse, we would build an Eclipse plugin to be able to connect
to an XWiki instance and load a specified list of spaces. Then each space
would be organized by the type of code in this space. Content and Textarea
fields would be made visible as editable content in Eclipse.
The plugin should detect the type of code in each of the content or
textarea fields (velocity/html, groovy, javascript, css, translations,
xwiki syntax) and use the appropriate editor.
Finally a completion module could be provided by loading from the server a
list of available APIs.
The same plugin could also be able to organize the content from a local
maven project (based on 1/) and provide completion to such a project.
Live syntax checking could be provided.
3/ Integration of a WebIDE in XWiki
Based on Javascript WebIDE and web code editor softwares (Orion, Cloud9,
exoIDE, codemirror, etc..), we would provide a view on the code inside the
XWiki instance.
Code would be organized in the same way as in the Eclipse plugin and
appropriate editors would be used depending on the code type.
Completion could be provided in the velocity and groovy editors and
eventually in Javascript
Two views should be available, one for each AWM application, and one with
all the code in the Wiki.
Live syntax checking could be provided.
Solution 1/ is very powerful because it let's the user decide which is his
development environment, even if the tree structure won't be perfect. Still
he can see all the code in the wiki and work on it, including searching.
Committing is made very easy. There are some risks involved in the sync
process, particularly of you have multiple developers syncing local code
with the same dev server.
User can switch from local sync (local wiki) to remove sync (remove shared
wiki) and can therefore work offline more easily. Editing can be fully done
offline.
Providing syntax highlighting for many editors might prove difficult.
Solution 2/ is providing a nice XWiki environment inside Eclipse, without
the need for a local copy of the code. Committing would happen using the
browser.
Solution 3/ is the long term bet as the future is to have everything in the
web. Content is only in one place which makes things a little easier.
Development environment needs no setup.
However this is more "new" for developers which need to adopt the platform.
Live syntax checking is hard to provide but would be quite useful.
Alternatively mvn xar:format could also provide syntax checking for XWiki
syntax, velocity, groovy, js and css.
WDYT ? Which approaches do you believe would be the most promising.
Various comments:
* I've always been a big fan of XEclipse but it seems I've been the only one.
Whenever I've proposed to work on it and proposed ideas about it I was told that
it's not the future and the future is developing in the IDE using javascript. While
this is probably true, I don't see it happening with the same ease as your current
standalone IDE before 5 years at least.
* Your point 1) about exposing the XWiki model on the
file system so that any IDE can use it is what I've been working on for a long time.
(albeit very slowly). This is one of the reason I'm working on the new model, so that
I can develop a file-based implementation. Note that I've just started developing one
using Git as the backend in a branch and I've defined a way to map the XWiki model to
a filesystem. I'll create a page on the Design space of
dev.xwiki.org with what I have
so far so that we can discuss it.
* Existing WebIDE solutions are too early IMO. BTW exoIDE is a no go since it handles the
storage too using JCR and you cannot use it as a library. It would be good to have someone
research the state of open source WebIDE (with compatible licenses) hat can be used a
libraries but I fear that we won't find much.
So I see 3 steps:
* 1) Finish the syntax highlighting and autocompletion extension and publish it. Then
include it in the platform if other devs agree
* 2) Build on top of XEclipse to bring it to the next level
* 3) In // we continue working on the new model
Now you point 1) is interesting but is not easy to implement. Basically it means
implementing a VFS (Virtual File System) for the IDE. All IDEs have a VFS so it's just
about having an implementation that takes its data from a remote XWiki server using REST
but it might be slow and will need a lot of caching and thus sync, which we need anyway
for offline editing features (and is currently implemented in XEclipse). Thus the XEclpse
way is the easiest for short term progress on this IMO.
I also think XEclipse could be seen as an admin center (ie. perform admin tasks on
several XWiki instances, monitor its health, etc), but that's another topic.
Thanks
-Vincent
Ludovic