Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Backward compatibility strategy w/ young apis included

Hi devs, Here's my effort to try to put together all that has been said… :) The idea is that whenever you change an API (adding a new one or changing an existing one) you go through the list of strategies below, trying to find the first that matches your use case. * Strategy 1 (already in place): Whenever possible don't break backward compatibility and go through a deprecation mechanism: ** Deprecate classes/methods ** Move them to Legacy modules as soon as our code is not using them anymore ** Note: No need to touch CLIRR * Strategy 2 (new): If possible, code defensively, i.e. put code in internal and open up when api is stable later on, either when users ask for it or when someone feels it's the right time ** Note: No need to touch CLIRR * Strategy 3 (new): If not possible (for example complete new modules where you wish to separate what will become stable APIs in the future from internal code) then use the @Unstable annotation at class level (or method level) ** Whenever we work on a new N.0 milestone 1 version, review all existing @Unstable annotation and for those that were added before N-1.0 remove the annotation ** Exclude the classes/methods marked @Unstable from CLIRR

* Strategy 4: If the API is stable and the developers wants to break it (change of signature for example) and all other strategies don't apply, then either: ** (new) Just do it and modify the CLIRR exclude. Preferable (but not mandatory) send a NOTICE email to warn others devs that an API is going to be broken in the next release ** If not sure, send a PROPOSAL or VOTE email depending on how important you think the API to be broken is WDYT?