27 Oct
2009
27 Oct
'09
6:42 p.m.
Hello,
I already use it as default (since 1.9.x) as I have a solution with too many
data (mainly attached documents) to index and needed a more powerful
indexation engine. Lucene works quite good for me but you are right, those
open issues might be ennoying... I'm not expert enough to choose...
Pascal
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.st> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
22 opens issues on the lucene plugins seems to me a lot to put it as a
default.
Of course, I'd really like to see most of them solved, but some seems
to me blocker issue to put the lucene plugins as the default:
XPLUCENE-5
XPLUCENE-8
XPLUCENE-13
XPLUCENE-30
XPLUCENE-33
XPLUCENE-34
XPLUCENE-35
XPLUCENE-37
XPLUCENE-40
If search seems powerful (which the XWIki search is not), but is
unreliable, I think that you will disappoint more than a less powerful
but reliable solution (which the XWiki search is).
WDYT ?
Denis
On Oct 26, 2009, at 21:00, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Should we make the lucene search the default search or not?
In the default XAR the Lucene search is marked as experimental. This
has been the case for a long time now.
I think we need to do something about this. Do you think the Lucene
search is working well enough to be set as the default?
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs