On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
  On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne
 <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
  On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
 <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> 
wrote:
 >
>>
>> > On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne < 
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
 >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>> >> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol < 
vincent(a)massol.net>
 >> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi devs,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there
are
>> some guidelines here:
>> 
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
>> >>>>
>> >>>> For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should
 be
 >> renamed authenticator-android IMO.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
>> >>> implementing Android authentication API, so very different from
 other
 >> >>> authenticator-* which are
authenticator you install in XWiki.
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regarding 
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to
decide
>> what to do on 2 aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just 
serves
 >> as an examle for the generic discussion):
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub
>> modules? Just use the concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should 
 be
 >> define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or
“other-oidc” or something else. I
>> think just the concept name is ok. WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
>> >> prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't
indicate anything.
>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and
>> odic-provider. Should this be named authenticator-odic and 
 provider-odic
 think
    so. WDYT?
 >>
 >> I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
 >> naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
 >> the ids of most of the platform modules…
 >
 > Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org.
 >
 > For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules>
 > For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules>
 
  We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the
naming rule of
 <type>-<module>- is only for the top level name. And submodules always
 follow the rule of <topmodulename>-<submodule>.
 
 Repeating the top module name is redundant IMO, that's why I've used
 application-ckeditor/ui and application-filemanager/api 
 
 You are talking about the folder here while the discussion is more
 about the module name IMO. We could indeed start another discussion
 about the folder name but I don't think we should mix.
 So you did prefixed all submodule with top level id too :) 
 
   And yes the way I understood it the rule about
suffixes like
 "application-", "api-" was only about top level modules for me.
Yes, that's what I understood too.
  Then I
 find way cleaner you have consistent naming inside the same
 repository.
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Remove-all-duplicated-information-fr…
 
 Thanks,
 Marius
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 > Thanks
 > -Vincent
 >
 >
 >>
 >>>>
 >>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
 >>>>
 >>>> Thanks
 >>>> -Vincent
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
  _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
 --
 Thomas Mortagne 
 
 --
 Thomas Mortagne
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs