On 19 Mar 2019, at 12:11, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Please vote on the Tiers we should have on XWiki's OpenCollective page
https://goo.gl/forms/qTDsxt1GvpU0ET3n2
* What is a member?
* For me the Tshirt is not part of the title but it’s a reward.
* Issue sponsor isn’t defined well enough. You seem to indicate 1 issue only… which is
low. Is it 1 issue per release? Also needs some limits on the complexity (such as < 2
days of work). I would put 2000 euros for 2 days of work since the goal is not to do
service work but to sponsor the sofware and by doing so you get a reward. So it has to be
higher than if you were just paying for an issue. So I would put 2000 euros for max of 2
days issues per month. 1000 euros for 1 day is also possible but reduces a lot the type of
issues that can be taken.
* For all of them I find the description too weak. We need to explain where the money goes
in more details IMO. Also what about XWiki SAS’s current sponsoring. Why would anyone want
to give when XWiki SAS gives already? This is not explained.
* Support Sponsor is interesting but it should be 1000 euros per month and be limited to 2
hours IMO.
Regarding Issue sponsor and Support Sponsor there’s an issue though. It’s not clear where
the money goes and what it’ll be used for. Imagine, for example, that Clemens does an
Issue sponsor. Does some part of the money go to him? If not, what is it used for and how
does it benefit Clemens globally?
So I really think we need to explain what the money is going to be used in details, on top
of what XWiki SAS already sponsors. That should be our first step IMO.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:26 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> I’d say that we should start with opencollective for now.
>
> We can always add more later on. But the importance is to get started.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 16:39, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> For the record: OpenCollective's 'competitor'
>
https://communitybridge.org,
>> still in early access, but launched by Linux Foundation (
>>
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/)
>>
>> We could use the CommunityBridge in parallel with OpenCollective.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:20 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:22 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>
>>>> This is a proposal for the content we would have if we were to create
> an
>>>> OpenCollective account for XWiki.
>>>> Take a look at
>>>>
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective
>>>>
>>>> The issues we need to solve / validate are:
>>>> A. Decide on the URL name (xwiki is already taken by XWiki SAS)
>>>> B. See if XWiki SAS can act like our Fiscal host
>>>> C. Validate the tiers and content
>>>>
>
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective#HTiers
>>>> (we might need more details on how the "Bug Fixer" works in
case we
> agree
>>>> to it)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>> Caty
>>>>
>>>>
>
>