10 Apr
2017
10 Apr
'17
11:17 a.m.
I think it would be useful even for developers. Having only a zip to get to
run the latest XWiki Standard flavor and starting working with, and a
single place to put our patched JARS instead of looking at the good
location on extensions/repository, would definitively make our life easier.
However, this might be easy to create with the packager plugin for people
(like me) who need it.
2017-04-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Eduard Moraru
<enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
package
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
Hi,
I would like to see a single download on the XWiki Download page: XWiki.
This distribution should be a minimal distribution (in various formats:
war/jetty+hsqldb/deb/etc.) that has the minimal stuff required for EM+DW
to
function, to launch the Flavor selection screen
and to install a Flavor.
Installing the Standard/Default/KB flavor will install, as dependency,
the
Base Flavor and everything will be brought in
with EM.
This is what I remember to be the original plan for the Flavors effort
and
I`m still +1 for it.
This is the plan (at least it's mine :)) but that does not really
answer the question: should we maintain a jetty/hsqldb package of the
KB flavor for testers who knows where to get it.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> My vision is that in the future we will have more Flavors supported, not
> just the KB one.
> I'm sure we would want to have at least one more flavor for Development,
> for example.
> So what will be the strategy? will we provide packaging for all the
> "support" Flavors? The argument would be the same, having the jetty > will be easier to use and test on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > >> On 4 Apr 2017, at 11:48, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi dev,
> > >>
> > >> The title say it all.
> > >>
> > >> The whole point of Knowledge Base flavor move is to stop
maintaining a
> > >> set of install packages and
only provide the flavor.
> > >
> > > For me there’s a difference between the flavor and the packaging we
> > propose. The goal of the flavor is not stop maintaining packagings
but
to
> > offer various content
> >
> > It's possible you are mixing stuff here. I'm not talking about stop
> > providing any jetty/hsqldb package, you would have the XWiki one on
> > which you are asked which flavor you want. I'm only talking about a
> > special Knowledge Base one.
> >
> > >
> > >> Now it could be a pain for testers to have to install the flavor
every
> > >> time so we might still release
a jetty/hsqldb package but not list
it
> > >> on
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download for example.
> > >>
> > >> WDYT ?
> > >
> > > This packaging is one of the most widely used because it’s one of
the
> > simplest to get started with XWiki.
> > >
> > > See the green share on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/
> > bin/temp/space/page/chart/1795539013.png
> > >
> > > So I think we should definitely keep it.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I would prefer to avoid that but I can understand if others think
it's
> > required.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --
> > >> Thomas Mortagne
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> >
>
--
Thomas Mortagne