4 May
2010
4 May
'10
10:40 a.m.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 09:56, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
No these were set and change. I have look closely to it, and it seems that
all member object of each group has changed their GUID between my initial
commit of those groups and the tomcat restart.
Does this means C and not "?" ?
Right C is conflict. ? when there is no status info (except if pages are
identifical, in this case they are not reported)
Ok, it is due to the fact that you reset the version to 1.1 before
check-ins. But you cannot really rely on the wiki version since these could
be deleted as well. Keeping the information in the document should helps
there, since deleting versions or moving the document to another wiki would
then keep that information in good shape. Probably you could imagine a
method similar to the classical SVN which has a checkout and an export
feature.
I see a great value in your product to maintain several wiki up to date or
check for discrepancies.
Denis
Le 04/05/10 09:10, Denis Gervalle a écrit :
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 21:54, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
What do you means by "reset history" ? is it a feature that I am not aware
of ?
Currently, document has discrepancies between what is cached, and what is
stored. This should be the cause of the exception.
Hi Denis,
Thanks for the feedback and testing
Le 03/05/10 21:20, Denis Gervalle a écrit :
Hi Ludovic,
Resaving may be not possible due to the exception you may get when you
save.
There is reset history that allows to fix the page if the history is
broken (however that's not enough. we need to find the source of the issue)
I have made some quick testing of this application in our sandbox, and I
have discovered weird issues in relation with the document history.
Here is what I have noticed so far:
I've seen indeed some issue with the history. I thought it was limited
to
having to resave the document to fix it.
I will look into it. I had to add some code
specially for handling
attachments. I suspect that is what is creating the problems
No attachment in my test, just a very small page. The issue is in the way
you manage archives.
I meant "caused by the code for attachments" not "caused when there is
attachments"
- Checking out new document from the
repository, the document does not
I do not investigate, just noticed that after a tomcat restart, one GUID
has changed on all groups.
Maybe the GUID is not set before. This is something to look at.
have
an history at all, and the creator of the document is not set
- Checking out a existing document from the repository (reverting a
change), cause the history of the document to be somewhat inverted, the
current document being 1.1 version and the history containing later
versions... (except when only 1.1 version were existing). The document
also
cause an exception when you try to save some modification to it:
Detailed information:
Error number 3201 in 3: Exception while saving document
Main.TestPage2
Wrapped Exception: Failed to commit or rollback transaction. Root cause
[]
com.xpn.xwiki.XWikiException: Error number 3201 in 3: Exception while
saving document Main.TestPage2
Wrapped Exception: Failed to commit or rollback transaction. Root cause
[]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.XWikiHibernateStore.saveXWikiDoc(XWikiHibernateStore.java:638)
...
Wrapped Exception:
org.hibernate.StaleStateException: Batch update returned unexpected row
count from update [1]; actual row count: 0; expected: 1
The change is then recorded in the archive and not in the document,
creating
the same "inverted" history situation. I suspect it happen due to
a discrepancy between the cache and the database, since after a restart,
the
1.1 (current) version is no more in the history.
- After a restart, I also got some "C" status, which are not documented,
and I imagine, means conflict. But since this is just a restart that
cause
them, this not expected. Looking at the details, this append on groups,
because of object GUID changes without any other changes, and it may be
unrelated to your application in particular.
Interesting. How come would GUID change in groups ?
Indeed this does not seem related to the SVN
app.
Either this is normal and then we could change the comparaison to ignore
such GUID changes. However the GUID is important data.
Probably it is not related and would not do that.
- At an initial attempt to go back to the list after committing and
then
updating a new page, it has shown a status of '?' in place of 'M', but I
have not reproduced that later :(
The only reason to show ? is that either
there is a change both in SVN and in the Wiki
OR
the status information is not filled in
Agree, and I have get that while the status is available, but I was
unable to reproduce :(
- SVN operations also cause the recycle bin to
contains deleted
Well, it would be nice, but it has more than you expect, and the way you
get rid of the Tag object could also be an issue, due to the bad way object
are deleted currently in documents.
Do you really need that status information ?
Yes we could have removed it, but i wanted NO impact on the pages of the
wiki so that it could be used in shared wikis environments without changing
the data too much.
I did not find a way to do without the status that would not mean going
through the whole history until you find the matching data, and this
solution would be way to slow.
document,
is it intended ?
This is possible.. I have to check
I also have a question regarding the usage of the status field. Why it is
required to keep this status ? if needed, why
coding it in place of
keeping
it with each document (in an xobject) ?
I thought about that but did not want the SVN application to have any
impact on
the wiki you want to commit to SVN
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 19:42, Ludovic Dubost<ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi,
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
If you are following the xwiki comments, you might have seen that I've
been
working on an SVN application for XWiki.
I've published this application here:
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/SVNApplication
The objective of this application is to bring to XWiki Applications more
professional development practices.
One of them is the ability to do version management of XWiki
applications.
Of course XWiki contains versioning but this versioning does not apply
accross wikis and makes it difficult to contribute code back to the
community.
With the SVN application you can now directly contribute code and code
updates to the XWiki SVN contrib repository or to any other SVN
repository.
You can even commit in multiple SVN repositories in the same Wiki.
The SVN Application supports:
1/ Compare the Wiki (limited to a list of spaces) with the SVN
repository
listing
- added pages in the wiki
- modified pages in the wiki
- new pages in SVN
- modified pages in SVN
- conflicting pages modified in both SVN and the Wiki
2/ Commit in the SVN Repository
3/ Update from the SVN Repostory
4/ Show differences between SVN and the Wiki (in XML)
The SVN Application does not provide merging and conflict resolution.
The
SVN Application normalizes XWiki XML allowing the cleanup the XML to not
have the user, the dates, comments. This is necessary to provide
concurrent
development on multiple XWiki server without telling you that the pages
have
changed all the time.
The source code is of course in SVN at
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/sandbox/xwiki-svn/
Ludovic
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs