On 5 Feb 2016 at 14:27:11, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Can't we just keep the version, but
change/overwrite the comment text
to "Restored
from recycle bin”?
Ah no I’d be -1 for that. You’d loose the comment for whoever did the previous change.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5 Feb 2016 at 14:06:23, vincent(a)massol.net (vincent(a)massol.net(mailto:
> vincent(a)massol.net)) wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I’ve just realized (thanks to a failing functional test) that we’ve
> changed the behavior we had when we restore a deleted document.
> >
> > We used to add a revision with a comment text of "Restored from recycle
> bin”.
> >
> > After
https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9960, there’s no new revision
> created when restoring a deleted document.
> >
> > We need to decide if that’s what we want.
> >
> > Apart from the fact that it’s a minor backward-compatibility breakage
> (for tools/scripts expecting that revision), the only downside I can see is
> that by looking at a document history you won’t be able to get the full
> list of what happened to this doc, i.e. that such user has restored the
> document.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> Thomas just told me that in practice this behavior was there prior to
> XWIKI-9960 (possibly done a long time ago) and that XWIKI-9960 has just
> fixed the issue for documents *with* attachments, so that all documents now
> work the same.
>
> It’s possible that this change was done involuntarily as a side effect of
> other issues we fixed (when playing with doc meta data dirty and content
> dirty flags).
>
> So while this is not a regression for 7.4.1/8.0M1, it would still be
> interesting to confirm here if that’s the behavior we want.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
> > Personally I think this could be acceptable but I’m not sure.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent