Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Change of XS Cycle strategy to account for Christmas

Hi, Vincent. +1 for the general goal of avoiding needless holiday stress. Now, on the details, there is something I'm struggling to understand: * I see that we have 2 options for finishing N.11: A) In the middle of December (i.e. 10.11RC on 10th of Dec -2w- and 10.11 Final on 17 Dec -1w-), similar to what we did for 9.11.x (9.11RC1 was on 11th of Dec 2017 and 9.11 Final was on 18th of Dec 2017) B) At the beginning of January (i.e. 10.11RC on 17th of Dec -3w- and 10.11 Final on the 7th of Jan 2019 -3w-) ** I would personally prefer A) in order to "close the books" before the holiday season and start fresh in January. Anyone working during the Holidays can start on N+1.0 or work on bugfixes for N.11.1. * In both cases, N+1.0 should be same at the end of January, not February. ** Why would it have to be end of February, and thus lose a release, as mentioned in your "Cons" section? ** I get it if it comes as a new proposal to double the length of N.0 to 2m instead of 1 (for which I'd be +0, since I prefer less exceptions, if possible), but I don't get it if we see it as a consequence of how we handle holidays. Side note: While trying to understand how all of this works, I can't but help to notice how the week-based calculations don't add up, since a month is 4.3(3) weeks long and everything planned around weeks is bound to be distorted when you look at it by months. IMO, it would make more sense to reason in terms of months (synchronized with our 12 releases cycle) and say things like "last Monday of December". Not sure how easy it would be to work with... just food for thought. Thanks, Eduard On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:13 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: