On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
 On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
 wrote:
 On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
 wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vincent Massol
>> <vincent(a)massol.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pascal,
>>>
>>> See 
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>
>> Ok I see!
>> And has anyone tried to hook the text renderer or at least chosen
>> the URL?
>> :)
>> (?xpage=text)
>> (?xpage=plaintext)
>> or simply replace (?xpage=plain)
>
> see 
http://markmail.org/thread/bao6nn5qgmo7w45j
>
 It is quite strange to speak with someone quoting Jira :) 
 That was a mail thread, not jira. I'm sorry but I don't have the time
 to copy paste all past discussions just for your pleasure or not
 having to read an email thread... ;)
 
 Really sorry about that but I'm also in a hurry looking at several
 things at
 the same time and I just thought I was still in JIRA without looking
 at the
 mail thread behind...For my (p)leasure, I will read it because it
 seems to
 answer my question...
  Ok Mr. Jira and do you confirm that nobody coded
this part which
 routes the
 renderer to the plain text renderer when syntax is 2.0? 
 Hmm... why don't you look at the jira issue? There's a field named
 "status" which shows if the issue has been implemented or not...
 Hint: it says "open". So yes it's not been done...
 
 
 I can see that but this status doesn't mean that anybody has never
 tried to
 code it...
 but you're a bad guy making me a fool like that because you've just
 modified
 the JIRA in the meantime to add the mail thread in case anybody
 thought I
 was not silly enough :):):):) 
 No I did that before you answered just because I noticed that the
 thread was not referenced from the jira issue.
 I'm not a bad guy, unless you consider that the following is bad:
 - trying to help you
 - answering quickly to your questions
 - answering even though you didn't search the mail archives before
 asking
 ;)
 
ok i give up, you are too strong :)
I'm just a fool because I was searching in 
xwiki.org about it and not in the
mails:)
Ok joking is enough :)
When somebody knowing it will have time, it would be fine to put in a small
page in 
xwiki.org the different options for xpage and the behavior between
xwiki/1.0 and 2.0... might be useful...
The same for the jsfx module (one can find some little info about jsx or ssx
but not jsfx or the search engine doesn't index it well)
This is not a critic because I know how difficult it is to keep doc alive...
but for new modules like that, just a small page giving the role and the
options would be useful...
thanks anyway
Pascal
 [snip]
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs