Re: [xwiki-devs] [Feedback] Evaluation of Travis as a CI tool

Dear devs, It's been a while I'm using Travis-CI.org as a CI tool for my projects. And I thought why not using it with XWiki? So I investigate a bit with xwiki/xwiki-commons [1]. If you don't want to read the details below, here is a resume. I would push to keep Jenkins at this point (much more complete than Travis) but, one killing-feature is missing (in my opinion): integration with Github (display the result of a build in Pull Request is of great value when evaluating a PR). The following list is not exhaustive and is mainly about the most important features I've noticed. ### Travis # Benefit * We don't maintain a server * It's well-integrated with Github * It builds Pull Requests * It builds Branches * UI is pretty nice (at least better than Jenkins, hey!) # Drawbacks * You cannot choose which branches you want to build (all or none) * The UI is crashing often on Firefox (blocks the browser for few seconds before Firefox propose to kill the script) * You only have a raw log (meaning Travis cannot present information of the log with a organised structure) ### Jenkins # Benefits * We already have it and it works * It's specifically adapted for Java project (much much more details to parse the result of the build logs) * It can build branches * It can build Pull Requests # Drawbacks * Consumes a lot of resources on our servers * UI is not easy to browse (note that it show much more than Travis so of course, it's more difficult to do an UI with more information!) [1] https://travis-ci.org/woshilapin/xwiki-commons/ -- Jean Simard jean.simard(a)xwiki.com Research engineer at XWiki SAS http://www.xwiki.com Committer on the XWiki.org project http://www.xwiki.org _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs