27 Oct
2011
27 Oct
'11
10:52 a.m.
+1 (non binding)
--G
2011/10/27 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
not
sure why we need the 2 methods that are there now. That doesn't look
right.
Sure, the first one does not seems very useful. I mean it is but there
is no need to provide a method for something that is just
xdom.getChildren().
I would also like to put getCurrentSyntax as public method since it
could be very useful too and not that easy to reproduce.
Hi devs,
Right now it's not very easy for a macro to properly deal with content
parsing especially the way to find which syntax to use to parse the
content.
There is a very useful tool that we are using internally but its not
public so contribution macros can't use that.
I propose to move
org.xwiki.rendering.internal.macro.MacroContentParser to
org.xwiki.rendering.macro.MacroContentParser.
WDYT ?
Here is my +1
+1 but maybe the interface needs to be reviewed to verify it's ok. I'm
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs