To be honest I think we should not have too many menu entries, or we might
need to find a way to split it again (just like we did with copy, delete,
etc.)
That's why I am not very fond of creating the 'Included Pages' and the
'Backlinks' viewers. I don't find them that useful and they are somehow
technical. We removed Children from Information in order to replace Space
Index and also because we have the Children / Sibling mix.
I agree that View Source could be moved in Information.
Thanks,
Caty
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s the outcome of a discussion I had with Caty/Edy on IRC + addition
of some elements of my own.
The idea is to clarify our strategy for the “More Actions” menu.
So here’s a proposal:
* The More Actions menus is actually a "More" menu since it doesn't
contain only actions. Specifically it contains 2 types of links:
** Actions such as Export, Annotate, Print, Share
** Information about the page (they're not actions): History,
Comments/Annotations, Children, Attachments
* The "View Source" entry is not placed correctly and should be moved to
the information section
* The "Information" entry could be renamed or be made more specific since
the whole section of the menu is about information about the page. It used
to contain children but that's been separated so all it contains now are
included pages and backlinks. These could be transformed into 2 viewers:
one for includes pages and one for backlinks
* The extradocs tabs do not need to match the information section of the
"More" menu. We only display in the tabs the most important actions.
* Idea: In order not to have too many tabs and to simplify the UI, we
could decide to remove the Information one and have "Included Pages" and
"Backlinks" only as menu entries.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs