Hi XWikiers,
I like 12B and 12E.
I like 15, which to me is probably the most distinctive of all the logos
presented. I also like the fact that one can read a X, a W, a i and a K in
that little guy's shape :-) I think the "-" should be removed between the
"X" and "Wiki" and that the case should be switched from
"X-WIKI" to "XWiki"
but that's minor. In short, probably my favorite one.
I have an issue with 16 -> I showed it to a couple friends and they were
unable to read it as "XWiki". I kinda like it but I already know it's
supposed to mean "XWiki" but I'm afraid it's not readable enough for
other
people.
I also like 19 (the two-colors version, not the 3D shaped one). I also
happened to see a version of 19 with a font that made it look nicer -> JV,
do you think that version could be added to the page?
Guillaume
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Emilie Ogez <Emilie.Ogez(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
My favorite is also 15.
Denis Gervalle a écrit :
My favorite is 15.
* nice work done for 15 but i find the logo too similar to Atlassian
logo (any basic human based logo would look too
Atlassiannish to me i
think)
I strongly disagree that just because it represent a people, it is
Atlassian
like, they do not hold the exclusivity of people
logos.
Atlasian logo is like a weight-lifter that lift the world, very straight
on
its foot. Nothing to do with a happy jumping man,
using really curved
shape
at all !
XWiki is about peoples sharing information and compare to most other
logo,
15 is one that have the most interesting
evocation.
Without dash, in red or another color, avoiding blue (even if I like it)
and
probably using a more curved font to improve, if
needed, the clear
difference it have with the Atlassian logo.
I would be curious to see what Vishal could propose with some more work.
19 would be my second choice, since it is curved, and even nice straight
logo like 7, 8 or 16 evoke to me some inflexibility or technicality,
which
is frightening.
12 could be interesting as a continuation on the initial theme, but it
would
be less distinctive with
XWiki.com, probably a
nice evolution for them
not
for the open-source one.
1, 2 and 13 are not scaling. 17 is nice, but not scaling and evocation is
inappropriate. Appart for not being easy to scale, I feel 4 is not
readable
for newcomers, using only 2 pencils, could
probably helps there.
Many thanks to all designers anyway for their proposal and please do not
feel hurt by my remarks that I really hope to be constructive.
Denis
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge