Re: [xwiki-devs] [Iteration][UX] Extended Breadcrumb

Hi Vincent, The iteration follows two ideas: A. combine the global menu functionality with breadcrumbs (this was again suggested by you when we proposed Macaw skin); B. use trees inside the breadcrumb; I've iterated on A) in order to demonstrate how it will look like, what problems/confusions might appear. My conclusion is that combining the 2 functionalities will increase complexity and cause either harder navigation or confusion (depending if we display or not the entity icons). The solution could be to keep the breadcrumb for navigation, while transferring the global-menu actions inside the content-menu (but this ideally needs to be adaptive - which is again not that straightforward to implement) + Drawer. I've iterated also on B). The usage of tree depends on how many entries we plan to display in the breadcrumb (3, 5+, etc.) in order to provide added value by tree usage. This direction could have further iterations if we want to go this way, like: - provide also actions inside the Tree displayer (still actions needs to be limited + plus think about mobile usage); - have a common activator (we could use the Home icon) or localized tree activator (the mockup displays a localized activator on '...'); - other? Some questions that appeared during this iteration: - what do we do with the parent/child backwards compatibility? - when we have nested spaces, we display the space or the space.webhome? the type of the entry is a space or the page? - how important is to limit the breadcrumb display? usually how many entries we have in a breadcrumb? Should we default for more than 7 entries or keep 3 like we currently have? - how important is to provide fast access for Watch or Delete space actions? or other actions inside the global-menu? Administration and Indexes could be displayed in the Drawer, Watch+Delete inside the content-menu ( http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/MacawSkin#HGlobalMenu) Compared to other proposals (when the 'final' solution was presented), here it was mostly an iteration, exploring possible approaches and requesting feedback or other ideas. Thanks, Caty On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: