I have no opinion so far since I've not used GWT
yet.
My only opinion: make sure to choose a framework that has a good
community (# of different committers), active (check mailing list
activity), good support (check mailing list activity), and that is the
de facto choice of people using GWT.
However before changing, it seems that GWT TK support GWT 1.4, see
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-tk/browse_thread/thread/8025767946742c52
Is a nightly build with no planned / announced release ok to use as
dependency in a platform module?
However, it seems that gwttk does not match all the the framework
requirements you have mentioned above so it might not be a bad idea to get
rid of it anyway...
Thanks
-Vincent
On Feb 26, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ancapaula.luca(a)xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
We have planned the GWT 1.4 upgrade for the next XWatch milestone at
the
end of march. For this, we need to make a decision regarding the web-
gwt
dependencies (for the moment, the xwiki gwt dialogs rely on the gwt-tk
library that does not yet have a release for gwt 1.4) so we must
choose
from:
- using another library to provide this functionality, particularly
the
MyGwt library
pros: nice looks and good API + the possibility of using the library
components in including projects.
cons: code changes required by the clean switch (updating all
involved
classes to use library API instead of GWT API), the lack of a maven
repository with all available MyGwt versions (only 0.5.0 rc). As well,
while testing, I experienced a couple of rendering issues (caused,
seemingly by the use of the strict or xhtml DTD).
- using the native gwt modal dialogs introduced in 1.4:
pros: not styled (we totally control the styling process and can
build an
uniform look); widgets consistency, at least at this level. A big
advantage is that the web-gwt module will not depend on any other
library
anymore.
cons: not styled, the usual GWT API (which can be poor in some
situations); GWT also has some problems caused by the standard mode
interpretation in browsers (caused by the doctype declaration) but in
this situation the code seems to be stable.
What do you think?
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs