Hi Sergiu,
Just my two cents since I have not thought deeply about it, but couldn't we
benefit on the fact that we minimize those files ? If we impose that jrsx
and ssrx files always got minimized, and that minimization somewhat does
not succeed unless we have a valid input, it would limit a lot what could
be read in the classpath ? Only Admin would still be able to request
unminimized files for debugging.
Is this really difficult or still present too much risks ?
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Hi devs,
Initially I didn't activate the resource skin extensions plugins (jsrx
and ssrx) for security considerations, since they can be used to read
any file from the classpath. I had forgotten to work on that, and now
they have been enabled and used in their current implementation for a
while. This means that changing the behavior will cause backward
incompatibilities...
So, I'm proposing that all skin resources packaged inside Jars should
reside under the /skinx/ root directory. This prefix shouldn't be
included in the pulled URL, it will be appended internally, and enforced
to prevent any /skinx/../privateresource tricks.
For example:
$xwiki.jsrx.use('/gmaps/gmaps.js')
will look for /skinx/gmaps/gmaps.js inside jars and the /classes/
directory.
As a migration plan I'd like to implement this check ASAP, add a
configuration for enabling the old behavior (if no resource was found
with the skinx prefix, search without the prefix), which should be set
to true by default in 4.5. Trigger a warning (in the logs) when such a
deprecated resource is found. For 5.0 we switch to false by default, and
in 6.0 we remove the switch completely.
WDYT?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO